linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] bcache: Remove some unnecessary NULL point check for the return value of __bch_btree_node

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CAJedcCzNB+1byPEzEgQ6ELjeoRQcZ=GnZg+1J4+FZvfnoK0H2Q@mail.gmail.com>
Date:   Fri, 3 Feb 2023 10:43:36 +0800
From:   Zheng Hacker <hackerzheng666@...il.com>
To:     Zheng Wang <zyytlz.wz@....com>
Cc:     colyli@...e.de, stable@...r.kernel.org, kent.overstreet@...il.com,
        linux-bcache@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        alex000young@...il.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] bcache: Remove some unnecessary NULL point check for the
 return value of __bch_btree_node_alloc-related pointer

Hello,

After writing the patch, I found there may be more places to replace
IS_ERR_OR_NULL to IS_ERR.
If the alloc of node will never be NULL, the additional NULL check of
nodes after allocation may also
be useless. This patch just fixes the check around the alloc. I'm not
sure about other places for my
limited understanding of the code in bcache.

Thanks,
Zheng Wang

Zheng Wang <zyytlz.wz@....com> 于2023年2月3日周五 10:28写道：
>
> Due to the previously fix of __bch_btree_node_alloc, the return value will
> never be a NULL pointer. So IS_ERR is enough to handle the failure
>  situation. Fix it by replacing IS_ERR_OR_NULL check to IS_ERR check.
>
> Fixes: cafe56359144 ("bcache: A block layer cache")
> Signed-off-by: Zheng Wang <zyytlz.wz@....com>
> ---
>  drivers/md/bcache/btree.c | 6 +++---
>  drivers/md/bcache/super.c | 2 +-
>  2 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/md/bcache/btree.c b/drivers/md/bcache/btree.c
> index 147c493a989a..417cd7c436c4 100644
> --- a/drivers/md/bcache/btree.c
> +++ b/drivers/md/bcache/btree.c
> @@ -1138,7 +1138,7 @@ static struct btree *btree_node_alloc_replacement(struct btree *b,
>  {
>         struct btree *n = bch_btree_node_alloc(b->c, op, b->level, b->parent);
>
> -       if (!IS_ERR_OR_NULL(n)) {
> +       if (!IS_ERR(n)) {
>                 mutex_lock(&n->write_lock);
>                 bch_btree_sort_into(&b->keys, &n->keys, &b->c->sort);
>                 bkey_copy_key(&n->key, &b->key);
> @@ -1352,7 +1352,7 @@ static int btree_gc_coalesce(struct btree *b, struct btree_op *op,
>
>         for (i = 0; i < nodes; i++) {
>                 new_nodes[i] = btree_node_alloc_replacement(r[i].b, NULL);
> -               if (IS_ERR_OR_NULL(new_nodes[i]))
> +               if (IS_ERR(new_nodes[i]))
>                         goto out_nocoalesce;
>         }
>
> @@ -1669,7 +1669,7 @@ static int bch_btree_gc_root(struct btree *b, struct btree_op *op,
>         if (should_rewrite) {
>                 n = btree_node_alloc_replacement(b, NULL);
>
> -               if (!IS_ERR_OR_NULL(n)) {
> +               if (!IS_ERR(n)) {
>                         bch_btree_node_write_sync(n);
>
>                         bch_btree_set_root(n);
> diff --git a/drivers/md/bcache/super.c b/drivers/md/bcache/super.c
> index ba3909bb6bea..92de714fe75e 100644
> --- a/drivers/md/bcache/super.c
> +++ b/drivers/md/bcache/super.c
> @@ -2088,7 +2088,7 @@ static int run_cache_set(struct cache_set *c)
>
>                 err = "cannot allocate new btree root";
>                 c->root = __bch_btree_node_alloc(c, NULL, 0, true, NULL);
> -               if (IS_ERR_OR_NULL(c->root))
> +               if (IS_ERR(c->root))
>                         goto err;
>
>                 mutex_lock(&c->root->write_lock);
> --
> 2.25.1
>