Message-ID: <CAMxBKG1s5pqU08w2keOxf7J9UJakiwbCVve9iSDr1Vis0=6biQ@mail.gmail.com>
Date:   Fri, 3 Feb 2023 18:23:38 +0000
From:   Darrell Kavanagh <darrell.kavanagh@...il.com>
To:     Hans de Goede <hdegoede@...hat.com>
Cc:     Bastien Nocera <hadess@...ess.net>,
        Jonathan Cameron <Jonathan.Cameron@...wei.com>,
        Jonathan Cameron <jic23@...nel.org>, linux-iio@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Bug#1029850: linux: Driver not loaded for ST Microelectronics
 LSM6DS3TR-C accelerometer (acpi:SMO8B30:SMO8B30:)

Finally got a 6.2.0-rc6 kernel built and installed, with the following
patch, and everything is working as expected.

Moving on now to look at Bastien's suggestion.

Thanks,
Darrell

diff --git a/kernel/drm_panel_orientation_quirks.c
b/kernel/linux-6.2-rc6/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_panel_orientation_quirks.c
index 3659f04..590bb7b 100644
--- a/kernel/drm_panel_orientation_quirks.c
+++ b/kernel/linux-6.2-rc6/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_panel_orientation_quirks.c
@@ -304,6 +304,12 @@ static const struct dmi_system_id orientation_data[] = {
                  DMI_EXACT_MATCH(DMI_PRODUCT_VERSION, "Lenovo ideapad
D330-10IGM"),
                },
                .driver_data = (void *)&lcd1200x1920_rightside_up,
+       }, {    /* Lenovo IdeaPad Duet 3 10IGL5 */
+               .matches = {
+                 DMI_EXACT_MATCH(DMI_SYS_VENDOR, "LENOVO"),
+                 DMI_EXACT_MATCH(DMI_PRODUCT_VERSION, "IdeaPad Duet 3 10IGL5"),
+               },
+               .driver_data = (void *)&lcd1200x1920_rightside_up,
        }, {    /* Lenovo Ideapad D330-10IGL (HD) */
                .matches = {
                  DMI_EXACT_MATCH(DMI_SYS_VENDOR, "LENOVO"),

On Wed, 1 Feb 2023 at 17:55, Hans de Goede <hdegoede@...hat.com> wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> On 2/1/23 18:50, Darrell Kavanagh wrote:
> > Thank you. I don't have anything that could be called a big machine.
> > The fastest processor I have access to is a Core m3-8100Y - that's in
> > a Chromebook with 4GB memory - it can run Linux in a chroot or
> > officially in Google's VM. I also have an ancient gen 2 core i5-2410M
> > machine which is slower than the m3 in theory, but that has 6GB of
> > memory.
> >
> > Is the kernel build more processor or memory bound?
>
> It is mostly processor bound, esp. wtih something like make -j4,
> make -j16 will start taking some RAM, but with make -j4 I expect you
> to be fully CPU bound.
>
> Regards,
>
> Hans
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> > On Wed, 1 Feb 2023 at 16:12, Bastien Nocera <hadess@...ess.net> wrote:
> >>
> >> On Wed, 2023-02-01 at 12:00 +0100, Hans de Goede wrote:
> >>> Hi,
> >>>
> >>> On 2/1/23 11:28, Jonathan Cameron wrote:
> >>>> On Wed, 1 Feb 2023 01:40:49 +0000
> >>>> Darrell Kavanagh <darrell.kavanagh@...il.com> wrote:
> >>>>
> >>>>> Hello, all.
> >>>>>
> >>>>> I've finally reached a conclusion on this, after testing all the
> >>>>> combinations of the patches (with and without reading the acpi
> >>>>> mounting matrix), window managers (wayland, xorg) and the
> >>>>> presence or
> >>>>> not of my custom kernel parms.
> >>>>>
> >>>>> What works well is the full set of patches with the custom kernel
> >>>>> parms and a new hwdb entry for the sensor:
> >>>>>
> >>>>> sensor:modalias:acpi:SMO8B30*:dmi:*:svnLENOVO*:pn82AT:*
> >>>>>  ACCEL_MOUNT_MATRIX=0, 1, 0; -1, 0, 0; 0, 0, 1
> >>>>>
> >>>>> The autorotate then works correctly in wayland and xorg, but for
> >>>>> xorg,
> >>>>> the settings say the screen is "portrait left" when in actual
> >>>>> fact it
> >>>>> is in standard laptop landscape orientation. Wayland does not
> >>>>> have
> >>>>> this problem (I guess because wayland's view of the screen is
> >>>>> straight
> >>>>> from the kernel).
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Without the hwdb entry, the orientation is 90 degrees out without
> >>>>> using the acpi matrix and 180 degrees out when using it. I could
> >>>>> have
> >>>>> gone either way here with appropriate hwdb entries, but my view
> >>>>> is
> >>>>> that we *should* be using the matrix.
> >>>>
> >>>> Added Hans de Goede as he has probably run into more of this mess
> >>>> than anyone else.  Hans, any thoughts on if we are doing something
> >>>> wrong on kernel side?  Or is the matrix just wrong *sigh*
> >>>
> >>> I see below that this laptop has a panel which is mounted 90 degrees
> >>> rotated, that likely explains why the ACPI matrix does not work.
> >>> So the best thing to do here is to just override it with a hwdb
> >>> entries.
> >>>
> >>> IIRC there are already 1 or 2 other hwdb entries which actually
> >>> override the ACPI provided matrix because of similar issues.
> >>>
> >>> Linux userspace expects the matrix in this case to be set so that
> >>> it causes e.g. gnome's auto-rotation to put the image upright
> >>> even with older gnome versions / mate / xfce which don't know about
> >>> the panel being mounted 90 degrees.
> >>>
> >>> So e.g. "monitor-sensor" will report left-side-up or right-side-up
> >>> while the device is actually in normal clamshell mode with the
> >>> display up-right.
> >>>
> >>> This reporting of left-side-up or right-side-up is actually "correct"
> >>> looking from the native LCD panel orientation and as mentioned is
> >>> done for backward compatibility. This is documented here:
> >>>
> >>> https://github.com/systemd/systemd/blob/main/hwdb.d/60-sensor.hwdb#L54
> >>>
> >>> The way we are handling this is likely incompatible with how Windows
> >>> handles this special case of 90° rotated screen + ROTM. Or the
> >>> matrix in the ACPI tables could be just wrong...
> >>>
> >>>> I think 'ROTM' is defined by MS.
> >>>> https://learn.microsoft.com/en-us/windows-hardware/drivers/sensors/sensors-acpi-entries
> >>>
> >>> Right and as such it would be good if we can still add support to
> >>> it to the sensor driver in question. Because the ROTM info usually
> >>> is correct and avoids the need for adding more and more hwdb entries.
> >>>
> >>> Note there already is existing support in some other sensor drivers.
> >>>
> >>> So we probably need to factor out some helper code for this and share
> >>> that between sensor drivers.
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>>> The only thing that concerns me is the need for custom kernel
> >>>>> parms.
> >>>>> It would be better if there was a way to avoid this, so that the
> >>>>> user
> >>>>> didn't have to mess around with their grub config. Though having
> >>>>> said
> >>>>> that, the sensors fix as we have it doesn't make things worse -
> >>>>> under
> >>>>> currently released kernels the screen always starts up sideways
> >>>>> unless
> >>>>> custom parms are added in grub.
> >>>
> >>> We actually have a quirk mechanism in the kernel for specifying
> >>> the need for: video=DSI-1:panel_orientation=right_side_up  and this
> >>> will also automatically fix the fbcon orientation, see:
> >>>
> >>> https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux.git/tree/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_panel_orientation_quirks.c
> >>>
> >>> If you submit a patch for this upstream please Cc me.
> >>
> >> And if after that change, and copy/pasting the orientation from the
> >> DSDT into hwdb the sensor and screen move in the expected ways, then
> >> maybe stealing the BMC150 driver's
> >> bmc150_apply_bosc0200_acpi_orientation() might be a good idea.
> >>
> >> Once exported through "mount_matrix", iio-sensor-proxy should see it
> >> and read it without the need for a hwdb entry.
> >>
> >> Cheers
> >
>

Powered by blists - more mailing lists