[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <Y91fnF5uEcSA0/99@P9FQF9L96D.corp.robot.car>
Date: Fri, 3 Feb 2023 11:25:16 -0800
From: Roman Gushchin <roman.gushchin@...ux.dev>
To: Michal Hocko <mhocko@...e.com>
Cc: Marcelo Tosatti <mtosatti@...hat.com>,
Leonardo BrĂ¡s <leobras@...hat.com>,
Johannes Weiner <hannes@...xchg.org>,
Shakeel Butt <shakeelb@...gle.com>,
Muchun Song <muchun.song@...ux.dev>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
cgroups@...r.kernel.org, linux-mm@...ck.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbecker@...e.de>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 0/5] Introduce memcg_stock_pcp remote draining
On Fri, Feb 03, 2023 at 04:21:09PM +0100, Michal Hocko wrote:
> OK, so this is a speculative patch. cpu_is_isolated doesn't exist yet. I
> have talked to Frederic off-list and he is working on an implementation.
> I will be offline next whole week (will be back Feb 13th) so I am
> sending this early but this patch cannot be merged without his one of
> course.
>
> I have tried to summarize the reasoning behind both approach should we
> ever need to revisit this approach. For now I strongly believe a simpler
> solution should be preferred.
>
> Roman, I have added your ack as you indicated but if you disagree with
> the reasoning please let me know.
Great, thank you for preparing it up! Really nice summary.
My ack definitely applies.
If you want, feel free to add a
"Suggested-by: Roman Gushchin <roman.gushchin@...ux.dev>"
tag to blame me later :)
Thank you!
Powered by blists - more mailing lists