[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20230203210654.GA877968-robh@kernel.org>
Date: Fri, 3 Feb 2023 15:06:54 -0600
From: Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>
To: Rafał Miłecki <zajec5@...il.com>
Cc: Srinivas Kandagatla <srinivas.kandagatla@...aro.org>,
Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@...aro.org>,
Matthias Brugger <matthias.bgg@...il.com>,
Kunihiko Hayashi <hayashi.kunihiko@...ionext.com>,
Masami Hiramatsu <mhiramat@...nel.org>,
linux-mediatek@...ts.infradead.org,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Rafał Miłecki <rafal@...ecki.pl>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/4] dt-bindings: nvmem: mmio: new binding for MMIO
accessible NVMEM devices
On Wed, Feb 01, 2023 at 07:47:14AM +0100, Rafał Miłecki wrote:
> From: Rafał Miłecki <rafal@...ecki.pl>
>
> With the NVMEM layouts binding in place we should now use:
> 1. NVMEM device access bindings
> 2. NVMEM content description bindings
>
> This binding allows describing NVMEM devices that can be MMIO accessed.
>
> Signed-off-by: Rafał Miłecki <rafal@...ecki.pl>
> ---
> .../devicetree/bindings/nvmem/mmio.yaml | 46 +++++++++++++++++++
> 1 file changed, 46 insertions(+)
> create mode 100644 Documentation/devicetree/bindings/nvmem/mmio.yaml
>
> diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/nvmem/mmio.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/nvmem/mmio.yaml
> new file mode 100644
> index 000000000000..27e3f6142769
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/nvmem/mmio.yaml
> @@ -0,0 +1,46 @@
> +# SPDX-License-Identifier: (GPL-2.0-only OR BSD-2-Clause)
> +%YAML 1.2
> +---
> +$id: http://devicetree.org/schemas/nvmem/mmio.yaml#
> +$schema: http://devicetree.org/meta-schemas/core.yaml#
> +
> +title: MMIO access based NVMEM
> +
> +description: |
> + This binding describes simple NVMEM devices that can be accessed by using MMIO
> + (memory-mapped I/O access).
> +
> + It's a generic solution for providing NVMEM content access. The way of
> + handling actual content may be device specific and can be described using a
> + proper layout.
Please add some guidance based on the discussion about when this should
and shouldn't be used. Specifically, anything with potential write
accesses should use a device specific compatible and not the generic
one.
> +
> +maintainers:
> + - Rafał Miłecki <rafal@...ecki.pl>
> +
> +allOf:
> + - $ref: nvmem.yaml#
> +
> +properties:
> + compatible:
> + const: mmio-nvmem
> +
> + reg:
> + maxItems: 1
> +
> + reg-io-width:
> + description: |
> + The size (in bytes) of the IO accesses that should be performed
> + on the device.
> + enum: [1, 2, 4, 8]
> +
> +required:
> + - reg
> +
> +unevaluatedProperties: false
> +
> +examples:
> + - |
> + nvmem@...00 {
> + compatible = "mmio-nvmem";
> + reg = <0x10000000 0x10000>;
> + };
> --
> 2.34.1
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists