linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 5/9] ARM: dts: exynos: move exynos-bus nodes out of soc in Exynos4412

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <697aa7b5-9c9b-eb4f-8111-c9a396d9d191@linaro.org>
Date:   Fri, 3 Feb 2023 22:12:46 +0100
From:   Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@...aro.org>
To:     Marek Szyprowski <m.szyprowski@...sung.com>,
        Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
        Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@...aro.org>,
        Alim Akhtar <alim.akhtar@...sung.com>,
        Kukjin Kim <kgene@...nel.org>, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
        linux-samsung-soc@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc:     replicant@...osl.org, phone-devel@...r.kernel.org,
        ~postmarketos/upstreaming@...ts.sr.ht,
        Martin Jücker <martin.juecker@...il.com>,
        Henrik Grimler <henrik@...mler.se>,
        Chanwoo Choi <cw00.choi@...sung.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 5/9] ARM: dts: exynos: move exynos-bus nodes out of soc in
 Exynos4412

On 03/02/2023 21:34, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
> On 03/02/2023 12:51, Marek Szyprowski wrote:
>> On 03.02.2023 12:46, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
>>> On 03/02/2023 12:45, Marek Szyprowski wrote:
>>>> On 29.01.2023 11:42, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
>>>>> On 25/01/2023 10:45, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
>>>>>> The soc node is supposed to have only device nodes with MMIO addresses,
>>>>>> as reported by dtc W=1:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>     exynos4412.dtsi:407.20-413.5:
>>>>>>       Warning (simple_bus_reg): /soc/bus-acp: missing or empty reg/ranges property
>>>>>>
>>>>>> and dtbs_check:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>     exynos4412-i9300.dtb: soc: bus-acp:
>>>>>>       {'compatible': ['samsung,exynos-bus'], 'clocks': [[7, 456]], 'clock-names': ['bus'], 'operating-points-v2': [[132]], 'status': ['okay'], 'devfreq': [[117]]} should not be valid under {'type': 'object'}
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Move the bus nodes and their OPP tables out of SoC to fix this.
>>>>>> Re-order them alphabetically while moving and put some of the OPP tables
>>>>>> in device nodes (if they are not shared).
>>>>>>
>>>>> Applied.
>>>> I don't have a good news. It looks that this change is responsible for
>>>> breaking boards that were rock-stable so far, like Odroid U3. I didn't
>>>> manage to analyze what exactly causes the issue, but it looks that the
>>>> exynos-bus devfreq driver somehow depends on the order of the nodes:
>>>>
>>>> (before)
>>>>
>>>> # dmesg | grep exynos-bus
>>>> [    6.415266] exynos-bus: new bus device registered: soc:bus-dmc
>>>> (100000 KHz ~ 400000 KHz)
>>>> [    6.422717] exynos-bus: new bus device registered: soc:bus-acp
>>>> (100000 KHz ~ 267000 KHz)
>>>> [    6.454323] exynos-bus: new bus device registered: soc:bus-c2c
>>>> (100000 KHz ~ 400000 KHz)
>>>> [    6.489944] exynos-bus: new bus device registered: soc:bus-leftbus
>>>> (100000 KHz ~ 200000 KHz)
>>>> [    6.493990] exynos-bus: new bus device registered: soc:bus-rightbus
>>>> (100000 KHz ~ 200000 KHz)
>>>> [    6.494612] exynos-bus: new bus device registered: soc:bus-display
>>>> (160000 KHz ~ 200000 KHz)
>>>> [    6.494932] exynos-bus: new bus device registered: soc:bus-fsys
>>>> (100000 KHz ~ 134000 KHz)
>>>> [    6.495246] exynos-bus: new bus device registered: soc:bus-peri (
>>>> 50000 KHz ~ 100000 KHz)
>>>> [    6.495577] exynos-bus: new bus device registered: soc:bus-mfc
>>>> (100000 KHz ~ 200000 KHz)
>>>>
>>>> (after)
>>>>
>>>> # dmesg | grep exynos-bus
>>>>
>>>> [    6.082032] exynos-bus: new bus device registered: bus-dmc (100000
>>>> KHz ~ 400000 KHz)
>>>> [    6.122726] exynos-bus: new bus device registered: bus-leftbus
>>>> (100000 KHz ~ 200000 KHz)
>>>> [    6.146705] exynos-bus: new bus device registered: bus-mfc (100000
>>>> KHz ~ 200000 KHz)
>>>> [    6.181632] exynos-bus: new bus device registered: bus-peri ( 50000
>>>> KHz ~ 100000 KHz)
>>>> [    6.204770] exynos-bus: new bus device registered: bus-rightbus
>>>> (100000 KHz ~ 200000 KHz)
>>>> [    6.211087] exynos-bus: new bus device registered: bus-acp (100000
>>>> KHz ~ 267000 KHz)
>>>> [    6.216936] exynos-bus: new bus device registered: bus-c2c (100000
>>>> KHz ~ 400000 KHz)
>>>> [    6.225748] exynos-bus: new bus device registered: bus-display
>>>> (160000 KHz ~ 200000 KHz)
>>>> [    6.242978] exynos-bus: new bus device registered: bus-fsys (100000
>>>> KHz ~ 134000 KHz)
>>>>
>>>> This is definitely a driver bug, but so far it worked fine, so this is a
>>>> regression that need to be addressed somehow...
>>>
>>> Thanks for checking, but what is exactly the bug? The devices registered
>>> - just with different name.
>>
>> The bug is that the board fails to boot from time to time, freezing 
>> after registering PPMU counters...
> 
> My U3 with and without this patch, reports several warnings:
> iommu_group_do_set_platform_dma()
> exynos_iommu_domain_free()
> clk_core_enable()
> 
> and finally:
> rcu: INFO: rcu_preempt detected stalls on CPUs/tasks:
> 
> and keeps stalling.
> 
> At least on next-20230203. Except all these (which anyway make board
> unbootable) look fine around PMU and exynos-bus.

I also booted few times my next/dt branch (with this patch) and no
problems. How reproducible is the issue you experience?

Best regards,
Krzysztof