linux-kernel - Re: [RFC PATCH V3 03/16] x86/hyperv: Set Virtual Trust Level in vmbus init message

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Fri, 3 Feb 2023 11:32:33 +0800
From:   Tianyu Lan <ltykernel@...il.com>
To:     "Michael Kelley (LINUX)" <mikelley@...rosoft.com>,
        "luto@...nel.org" <luto@...nel.org>,
        "tglx@...utronix.de" <tglx@...utronix.de>,
        "mingo@...hat.com" <mingo@...hat.com>,
        "bp@...en8.de" <bp@...en8.de>,
        "dave.hansen@...ux.intel.com" <dave.hansen@...ux.intel.com>,
        "x86@...nel.org" <x86@...nel.org>, "hpa@...or.com" <hpa@...or.com>,
        "seanjc@...gle.com" <seanjc@...gle.com>,
        "pbonzini@...hat.com" <pbonzini@...hat.com>,
        "jgross@...e.com" <jgross@...e.com>,
        Tianyu Lan <Tianyu.Lan@...rosoft.com>,
        "kirill@...temov.name" <kirill@...temov.name>,
        "jiangshan.ljs@...group.com" <jiangshan.ljs@...group.com>,
        "peterz@...radead.org" <peterz@...radead.org>,
        "ashish.kalra@....com" <ashish.kalra@....com>,
        "srutherford@...gle.com" <srutherford@...gle.com>,
        "akpm@...ux-foundation.org" <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
        "anshuman.khandual@....com" <anshuman.khandual@....com>,
        "pawan.kumar.gupta@...ux.intel.com" 
        <pawan.kumar.gupta@...ux.intel.com>,
        "adrian.hunter@...el.com" <adrian.hunter@...el.com>,
        "daniel.sneddon@...ux.intel.com" <daniel.sneddon@...ux.intel.com>,
        "alexander.shishkin@...ux.intel.com" 
        <alexander.shishkin@...ux.intel.com>,
        "sandipan.das@....com" <sandipan.das@....com>,
        "ray.huang@....com" <ray.huang@....com>,
        "brijesh.singh@....com" <brijesh.singh@....com>,
        "michael.roth@....com" <michael.roth@....com>,
        "thomas.lendacky@....com" <thomas.lendacky@....com>,
        "venu.busireddy@...cle.com" <venu.busireddy@...cle.com>,
        "sterritt@...gle.com" <sterritt@...gle.com>,
        "tony.luck@...el.com" <tony.luck@...el.com>,
        "samitolvanen@...gle.com" <samitolvanen@...gle.com>,
        "fenghua.yu@...el.com" <fenghua.yu@...el.com>
Cc:     "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        "kvm@...r.kernel.org" <kvm@...r.kernel.org>,
        "linux-hyperv@...r.kernel.org" <linux-hyperv@...r.kernel.org>,
        "linux-arch@...r.kernel.org" <linux-arch@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH V3 03/16] x86/hyperv: Set Virtual Trust Level in vmbus
 init message

On 2/1/2023 1:55 AM, Michael Kelley (LINUX) wrote:
>> index db2202d985bd..6dcbb21aac2b 100644
>> --- a/arch/x86/include/asm/hyperv-tlfs.h
>> +++ b/arch/x86/include/asm/hyperv-tlfs.h
>> @@ -36,6 +36,10 @@
>>   #define HYPERV_CPUID_MIN			0x40000005
>>   #define HYPERV_CPUID_MAX			0x4000ffff
>>
>> +/* Support for HVCALL_GET_VP_REGISTERS hvcall */
> The above comment isn't really right, in that these definitions
> aren't for the hypercall.  They are for the specific synthetic register.
> 
>> +#define	HV_X64_REGISTER_VSM_VP_STATUS	0x000D0003
>> +#define HV_X64_VTL_MASK			GENMASK(3, 0)
> Hyper-V synthetic registers have two different numbering schemes.
> For registers that have synthetic MSR equivalents, there's a full list
> starting with HV_X64_MSR_GUEST_OS_ID, which defines the MSR
> address.  But these registers also have register numbers that are
> not the same as the MSR address.  These register numbers
> aren't defined anywhere in x86 Linux code because we don't access
> them using the register number.   (The register numbers*are*
> defined in ARM64 code since ARM64 doesn't have MSRs.)  But this
> register is an exception on x86.  There's no MSR equivalent so we
> must use a hypercall to fetch the value.
> 
> I'd suggest starting a separate list after the definition of
> HV_X64_MSR_REFERENCE_TSC and make clear in a comment
> about the list that this is a list of register numbers, not MSR addresses.
> 

Agree. Will update in the next version.