linux-kernel - Re: Regression: v4l/bttv vbi vs iommu

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Fri, 3 Feb 2023 07:35:00 +0100
From:   Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de>
To:     Hans Verkuil <hverkuil@...all.nl>
Cc:     "Dr. David Alan Gilbert" <dave@...blig.org>, iommu@...ts.linux.dev,
        mchehab@...nel.org, hch@....de, linux-media@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Regression: v4l/bttv vbi vs iommu

On Wed, Feb 01, 2023 at 09:48:46PM +0100, Hans Verkuil wrote:
> In fact, the plan is to replace the old and deprecated videobuf framework by the vb2
> framework in the bttv driver in the next 2-3 months or so. That will also automatically
> solve this problem.

It would be great to expedite removal of the old videbuf code given
how many problems it has.