[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <ce9b4a79-b877-211d-aee8-bbc02e6805b5@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 3 Feb 2023 15:00:44 +0800
From: Tianyu Lan <ltykernel@...il.com>
To: Tom Lendacky <thomas.lendacky@....com>, luto@...nel.org,
tglx@...utronix.de, mingo@...hat.com, bp@...en8.de,
dave.hansen@...ux.intel.com, x86@...nel.org, hpa@...or.com,
seanjc@...gle.com, pbonzini@...hat.com, jgross@...e.com,
tiala@...rosoft.com, kirill@...temov.name,
jiangshan.ljs@...group.com, peterz@...radead.org,
ashish.kalra@....com, srutherford@...gle.com,
akpm@...ux-foundation.org, anshuman.khandual@....com,
pawan.kumar.gupta@...ux.intel.com, adrian.hunter@...el.com,
daniel.sneddon@...ux.intel.com, alexander.shishkin@...ux.intel.com,
sandipan.das@....com, ray.huang@....com, brijesh.singh@....com,
michael.roth@....com, venu.busireddy@...cle.com,
sterritt@...gle.com, tony.luck@...el.com, samitolvanen@...gle.com,
fenghua.yu@...el.com
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, kvm@...r.kernel.org,
linux-hyperv@...r.kernel.org, linux-arch@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH V3 10/16] x86/hyperv: Add smp support for sev-snp
guest
On 1/23/2023 11:30 PM, Tom Lendacky wrote:
> On 1/21/23 20:46, Tianyu Lan wrote:
>> From: Tianyu Lan <tiala@...rosoft.com>
>>
>> The wakeup_secondary_cpu callback was populated with wakeup_
>> cpu_via_vmgexit() which doesn't work for Hyper-V. Override it
>
> An explanation as to why is doesn't work would be nice here.
Hi Thomas:
Thanks for your review. Good idea. Will update.
>> diff --git a/arch/x86/include/asm/svm.h b/arch/x86/include/asm/svm.h
>> index cb1ee53ad3b1..f8b321a11ee4 100644
>> --- a/arch/x86/include/asm/svm.h
>> +++ b/arch/x86/include/asm/svm.h
>> @@ -336,6 +336,53 @@ struct vmcb_save_area {
>
> Please don't update the vmcb_save_area, you should be using/updating the
> sev_es_save_area structure for SNP.
OK. Will update in the next version.
>> u64 sev_feature_restrict_injection : 1;
>> + u64 sev_feature_alternate_injection : 1;
>> + u64 sev_feature_full_debug : 1;
>> + u64 sev_feature_reserved1 : 1;
>> + u64 sev_feature_snpbtb_isolation : 1;
>> + u64 sev_feature_resrved2 : 56;
>
> For the bits definition, use:
>
> u64 sev_feature_snp : 1,
> sev_feature_vtom : 1,
> sev_feature_reflectvc : 1,
> ...
>
Good suggestion. Thanks.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists