linux-kernel - Re: [RFT PATCH 05/14] arm64: dts: qcom: sc8280xp: correct TLMM gpio-ranges

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <96b2dc11-c9e2-58c9-ba95-7e7ee7218d16@linaro.org>
Date:   Fri, 3 Feb 2023 08:10:31 +0100
From:   Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@...aro.org>
To:     Konrad Dybcio <konrad.dybcio@...aro.org>,
        Brian Masney <bmasney@...hat.com>
Cc:     Andy Gross <agross@...nel.org>,
        Bjorn Andersson <andersson@...nel.org>,
        Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
        Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@...aro.org>,
        linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [RFT PATCH 05/14] arm64: dts: qcom: sc8280xp: correct TLMM
 gpio-ranges

On 03/02/2023 00:45, Konrad Dybcio wrote:
> 
> 
> On 2.02.2023 23:58, Brian Masney wrote:
>> On Wed, Feb 01, 2023 at 04:50:56PM +0100, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
>>> Correct the number of GPIOs in TLMM pin controller.
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@...aro.org>
>>> ---
>>>  arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sc8280xp.dtsi | 2 +-
>>>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>>>
>>> diff --git a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sc8280xp.dtsi b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sc8280xp.dtsi
>>> index fa2d0d7d1367..17e8c26a9ae6 100644
>>> --- a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sc8280xp.dtsi
>>> +++ b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sc8280xp.dtsi
>>> @@ -3533,7 +3533,7 @@ tlmm: pinctrl@...0000 {
>>>  			#gpio-cells = <2>;
>>>  			interrupt-controller;
>>>  			#interrupt-cells = <2>;
>>> -			gpio-ranges = <&tlmm 0 0 230>;
>>> +			gpio-ranges = <&tlmm 0 0 228>;
> Won't that kill the UFS pins?

This patchset is obsolete and replaced with v2. I alerady replied here
that this was not good approach...

Best regards,
Krzysztof