linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v3 3/3] riscv: dts: starfive: Add mmc node

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Fri, 3 Feb 2023 17:23:47 +0800
From:   William Qiu <william.qiu@...rfivetech.com>
To:     Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@...aro.org>,
        <linux-riscv@...ts.infradead.org>, <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>,
        <linux-mmc@...r.kernel.org>
CC:     Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
        Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@...aro.org>,
        Jaehoon Chung <jh80.chung@...sung.com>,
        Ulf Hansson <ulf.hansson@...aro.org>,
        <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 3/3] riscv: dts: starfive: Add mmc node



On 2023/2/3 17:02, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
> On 03/02/2023 09:19, William Qiu wrote:
>> This adds the mmc node for the StarFive JH7110 SoC.
> 
> Do not use "This xxx". Use imperative mode.
> https://elixir.bootlin.com/linux/v5.17.1/source/Documentation/process/submitting-patches.rst#L95
> 
>> Set mmco node to emmc and set mmc1 node to sd.
>> 
>> Signed-off-by: William Qiu <william.qiu@...rfivetech.com>
> 
> 
>> +
>>  &gmac0_rmii_refin {
>>  	clock-frequency = <50000000>;
>>  };
>> diff --git a/arch/riscv/boot/dts/starfive/jh7110.dtsi b/arch/riscv/boot/dts/starfive/jh7110.dtsi
>> index 64d260ea1f29..ae1a664e7af5 100644
>> --- a/arch/riscv/boot/dts/starfive/jh7110.dtsi
>> +++ b/arch/riscv/boot/dts/starfive/jh7110.dtsi
>> @@ -370,6 +370,11 @@ syscrg: clock-controller@...20000 {
>>  			#reset-cells = <1>;
>>  		};
>>  
>> +		sysreg: syscon@...30000 {
>> +			compatible = "starfive,sysreg", "syscon";
> 
> No:
> 1. Undocumented.
> 2. A bit too generic. You should have here SoC specific compatible as
> well (either as second or third compatible, if all your SoCs share
> register layout).
> 

Hi Krzysztof,

As for the compatible, I will change it to "starfive,jh7110-sysreg"
in next version,but for undocumented, I don't get it, can you
clarify that.
Thank you anyway.

Best regards,
William Qiu
>> +			reg = <0x0 0x13030000 0x0 0x1000>;
>> +		};
>> +
> 
> Best regards,
> Krzysztof
>