[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20230203094230.266952-6-thuth@redhat.com>
Date: Fri, 3 Feb 2023 10:42:28 +0100
From: Thomas Huth <thuth@...hat.com>
To: kvm@...r.kernel.org, Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@...hat.com>,
Sean Christopherson <seanjc@...gle.com>
Cc: kvmarm@...ts.linux.dev, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
kvm-riscv@...ts.infradead.org, Marc Zyngier <maz@...nel.org>,
James Morse <james.morse@....com>,
Suzuki K Poulose <suzuki.poulose@....com>,
Oliver Upton <oliver.upton@...ux.dev>,
Zenghui Yu <yuzenghui@...wei.com>,
Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@...ux.ibm.com>,
Janosch Frank <frankja@...ux.ibm.com>,
Claudio Imbrenda <imbrenda@...ux.ibm.com>,
David Hildenbrand <david@...hat.com>,
linuxppc-dev@...ts.ozlabs.org
Subject: [PATCH 5/7] KVM: s390: Use "int" as return type for kvm_s390_get/set_skeys()
These two functions only return normal integers, so it does not
make sense to declare the return type as "long" here.
Signed-off-by: Thomas Huth <thuth@...hat.com>
---
arch/s390/kvm/kvm-s390.c | 4 ++--
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/s390/kvm/kvm-s390.c b/arch/s390/kvm/kvm-s390.c
index e4890e04b210..8ad1972b8a73 100644
--- a/arch/s390/kvm/kvm-s390.c
+++ b/arch/s390/kvm/kvm-s390.c
@@ -1992,7 +1992,7 @@ static int kvm_s390_vm_has_attr(struct kvm *kvm, struct kvm_device_attr *attr)
return ret;
}
-static long kvm_s390_get_skeys(struct kvm *kvm, struct kvm_s390_skeys *args)
+static int kvm_s390_get_skeys(struct kvm *kvm, struct kvm_s390_skeys *args)
{
uint8_t *keys;
uint64_t hva;
@@ -2040,7 +2040,7 @@ static long kvm_s390_get_skeys(struct kvm *kvm, struct kvm_s390_skeys *args)
return r;
}
-static long kvm_s390_set_skeys(struct kvm *kvm, struct kvm_s390_skeys *args)
+static int kvm_s390_set_skeys(struct kvm *kvm, struct kvm_s390_skeys *args)
{
uint8_t *keys;
uint64_t hva;
--
2.31.1
Powered by blists - more mailing lists