[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <99c4db33a1966bd1979817277facb4a42ba2333f.camel@pengutronix.de>
Date: Fri, 03 Feb 2023 12:27:55 +0100
From: Lucas Stach <l.stach@...gutronix.de>
To: Bagas Sanjaya <bagasdotme@...il.com>,
Intel Graphics Development List
<intel-gfx@...ts.freedesktop.org>,
DRI Development List <dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Linux Media Mailing List <linux-media@...r.kernel.org>,
Linux Next Mailing List <linux-next@...r.kernel.org>
Cc: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@...ux.intel.com>,
Joonas Lahtinen <joonas.lahtinen@...ux.intel.com>,
Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@...el.com>,
Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@...ux.intel.com>,
David Airlie <airlied@...il.com>,
Daniel Vetter <daniel@...ll.ch>,
Luben Tuikov <luben.tuikov@....com>,
Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@...nel.org>,
Matt Roper <matthew.d.roper@...el.com>,
Gustavo Sousa <gustavo.sousa@...el.com>,
Balasubramani Vivekanandan <balasubramani.vivekanandan@...el.com>,
Matt Atwood <matthew.s.atwood@...el.com>,
José Roberto de Souza
<jose.souza@...el.com>,
Srinivasan Shanmugam <srinivasan.s@...el.com>,
Lucas De Marchi <lucas.demarchi@...el.com>,
Andrey Grodzovsky <andrey.grodzovsky@....com>,
Sakari Ailus <sakari.ailus@...ux.intel.com>,
Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>,
Hans de Goede <hdegoede@...hat.com>,
Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/3] drm/scheduler: Fix elapsed_ns kernel-doc error
Am Freitag, dem 03.02.2023 um 17:02 +0700 schrieb Bagas Sanjaya:
> Stephen Rothwell reported htmldocs warnings:
>
> include/drm/gpu_scheduler.h:232: warning: Incorrect use of kernel-doc format: * @elapsed_ns
> include/drm/gpu_scheduler.h:238: warning: Function parameter or member 'elapsed_ns' not described in 'drm_sched_entity'
>
> Fix the error by appending missing colon to @elapsed_ns name in its
> kernel-doc comment.
>
Thanks, I've added this to the etnaviv tree.
Since the commit is only in -next and not a non-rebase tree yet, I
might be tempted to squash the fix into the offending commit. What
would be the right way to credit you for the fix in that case?
Regards,
Lucas
> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-next/20230203135027.1a4679d3@canb.auug.org.au/
> Fixes: 248cd9b265fca6 ("drm/scheduler: track GPU active time per entity")
> Reported-by: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>
> Signed-off-by: Bagas Sanjaya <bagasdotme@...il.com>
> ---
> include/drm/gpu_scheduler.h | 2 +-
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/include/drm/gpu_scheduler.h b/include/drm/gpu_scheduler.h
> index 9a50365621ed8d..9db9e5e504eeb3 100644
> --- a/include/drm/gpu_scheduler.h
> +++ b/include/drm/gpu_scheduler.h
> @@ -229,7 +229,7 @@ struct drm_sched_entity {
> struct rb_node rb_tree_node;
>
> /**
> - * @elapsed_ns
> + * @elapsed_ns:
> *
> * Records the amount of time where jobs from this entity were active
> * on the GPU.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists