lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Fri, 3 Feb 2023 14:47:05 +0200
From:   Daniel Baluta <daniel.baluta@...il.com>
To:     "Peng Fan (OSS)" <peng.fan@....nxp.com>
Cc:     andersson@...nel.org, mathieu.poirier@...aro.org,
        shawnguo@...nel.org, s.hauer@...gutronix.de,
        arnaud.pouliquen@...s.st.com, kernel@...gutronix.de,
        festevam@...il.com, linux-imx@....com,
        linux-remoteproc@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        Peng Fan <peng.fan@....com>,
        Daniel Baluta <daniel.baluta@....com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH V2 5/6] remoteproc: imx_rproc: set Cortex-M stack/pc to TCML

On Fri, Jan 27, 2023 at 11:33 AM Peng Fan (OSS) <peng.fan@....nxp.com> wrote:
>
> From: Peng Fan <peng.fan@....com>
>
> The i.MX8M Cortex-M core not has ROM. It has a requirement is
> the stack, pc value should be set in address 0 and 4 from the view of
> itself. From Cortex-A core view, the region is at TCML start address.
>
> The stack and pc value are the first two words stored in section
> ".interrupts" of the firmware, and the section is the first section in
> the firmware.
>
> When the firmware is built to run in TCML, there is no issue, because
> when copying elf segments, the first two words are copied to TCML also.
>
> However when the firmware is built ro run in DDR, the first two words
> are not copied to TCML start address.
>
> This patch is to find the ".interrupts" section, read out the first
> two words and write to TCML start address at offset 0 and 4.
>
> Signed-off-by: Peng Fan <peng.fan@....com>
> ---
>  drivers/remoteproc/imx_rproc.c | 37 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-
>  1 file changed, 36 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/remoteproc/imx_rproc.c b/drivers/remoteproc/imx_rproc.c
> index 295e0e0e869a..f5ee0c9bb09d 100644
> --- a/drivers/remoteproc/imx_rproc.c
> +++ b/drivers/remoteproc/imx_rproc.c
> @@ -7,6 +7,7 @@
>  #include <linux/arm-smccc.h>
>  #include <linux/clk.h>
>  #include <linux/err.h>
> +#include <linux/firmware.h>

I wonder why do you need to include this? Nothing in this patch looks like
it is using it.

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ