[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <DU0PR04MB9417DE3B40EBEAD50E2117D188D79@DU0PR04MB9417.eurprd04.prod.outlook.com>
Date: Fri, 3 Feb 2023 12:50:58 +0000
From: Peng Fan <peng.fan@....com>
To: Daniel Baluta <daniel.baluta@...il.com>,
"Peng Fan (OSS)" <peng.fan@....nxp.com>
CC: "andersson@...nel.org" <andersson@...nel.org>,
"mathieu.poirier@...aro.org" <mathieu.poirier@...aro.org>,
"shawnguo@...nel.org" <shawnguo@...nel.org>,
"s.hauer@...gutronix.de" <s.hauer@...gutronix.de>,
"arnaud.pouliquen@...s.st.com" <arnaud.pouliquen@...s.st.com>,
"kernel@...gutronix.de" <kernel@...gutronix.de>,
"festevam@...il.com" <festevam@...il.com>,
dl-linux-imx <linux-imx@....com>,
"linux-remoteproc@...r.kernel.org" <linux-remoteproc@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org"
<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Daniel Baluta <daniel.baluta@....com>
Subject: RE: [PATCH V2 5/6] remoteproc: imx_rproc: set Cortex-M stack/pc to
TCML
Hi Daniel,
> Subject: Re: [PATCH V2 5/6] remoteproc: imx_rproc: set Cortex-M stack/pc
> to TCML
>
> On Fri, Jan 27, 2023 at 11:33 AM Peng Fan (OSS) <peng.fan@....nxp.com>
> wrote:
> >
> > From: Peng Fan <peng.fan@....com>
> >
> > The i.MX8M Cortex-M core not has ROM. It has a requirement is the
> > stack, pc value should be set in address 0 and 4 from the view of
> > itself. From Cortex-A core view, the region is at TCML start address.
> >
> > The stack and pc value are the first two words stored in section
> > ".interrupts" of the firmware, and the section is the first section in
> > the firmware.
> >
> > When the firmware is built to run in TCML, there is no issue, because
> > when copying elf segments, the first two words are copied to TCML also.
> >
> > However when the firmware is built ro run in DDR, the first two words
> > are not copied to TCML start address.
> >
> > This patch is to find the ".interrupts" section, read out the first
> > two words and write to TCML start address at offset 0 and 4.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Peng Fan <peng.fan@....com>
> > ---
> > drivers/remoteproc/imx_rproc.c | 37
> > +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-
> > 1 file changed, 36 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/remoteproc/imx_rproc.c
> > b/drivers/remoteproc/imx_rproc.c index 295e0e0e869a..f5ee0c9bb09d
> > 100644
> > --- a/drivers/remoteproc/imx_rproc.c
> > +++ b/drivers/remoteproc/imx_rproc.c
> > @@ -7,6 +7,7 @@
> > #include <linux/arm-smccc.h>
> > #include <linux/clk.h>
> > #include <linux/err.h>
> > +#include <linux/firmware.h>
>
> I wonder why do you need to include this? Nothing in this patch looks like it
> is using it.
It is the 2nd parameter of function imx_rproc_get_boot_addr use
'const struct firmware *'
Thanks,
Peng.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists