[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20230203135043.409192-32-james.morse@arm.com>
Date: Fri, 3 Feb 2023 13:50:42 +0000
From: James Morse <james.morse@....com>
To: linux-pm@...r.kernel.org, loongarch@...ts.linux.dev,
kvmarm@...ts.linux.dev, kvm@...r.kernel.org,
linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org, linux-arch@...r.kernel.org,
linux-ia64@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, x86@...nel.org
Cc: Marc Zyngier <maz@...nel.org>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Lorenzo Pieralisi <lpieralisi@...nel.org>,
Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>,
Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@....com>,
Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>, H Peter Anvin <hpa@...or.com>,
Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@...ux.intel.com>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>, Will Deacon <will@...nel.org>,
Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@....com>,
Huacai Chen <chenhuacai@...nel.org>,
James Morse <james.morse@....com>,
Suzuki K Poulose <suzuki.poulose@....com>,
Oliver Upton <oliver.upton@...ux.dev>,
Len Brown <lenb@...nel.org>,
Rafael Wysocki <rafael@...nel.org>,
WANG Xuerui <kernel@...0n.name>,
Salil Mehta <salil.mehta@...wei.com>,
Russell King <linux@...linux.org.uk>,
Jean-Philippe Brucker <jean-philippe@...aro.org>
Subject: [RFC PATCH 31/32] arm64: document virtual CPU hotplug's expectations
Add a description of physical and virtual CPU hotplug, explain the
differences and elaborate on what is required in ACPI for a working
virtual hotplug system.
Signed-off-by: James Morse <james.morse@....com>
---
Documentation/arm64/cpu-hotplug.rst | 79 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
Documentation/arm64/index.rst | 1 +
2 files changed, 80 insertions(+)
create mode 100644 Documentation/arm64/cpu-hotplug.rst
diff --git a/Documentation/arm64/cpu-hotplug.rst b/Documentation/arm64/cpu-hotplug.rst
new file mode 100644
index 000000000000..76ba8d932c72
--- /dev/null
+++ b/Documentation/arm64/cpu-hotplug.rst
@@ -0,0 +1,79 @@
+.. SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0
+.. _cpuhp_index:
+
+====================
+CPU Hotplug and ACPI
+====================
+
+CPU hotplug in the arm64 world is commonly used to describe the kernel taking
+CPUs online/offline using PSCI. This document is about ACPI firmware allowing
+CPUs that were not available during boot to be added to the system later.
+
+``possible`` and ``present`` refer to the state of the CPU as seen by linux.
+
+
+CPU Hotplug on physical systems - CPUs not present at boot
+----------------------------------------------------------
+
+Physical systems need to mark a CPU that is ``possible`` but not ``present`` as
+being ``present``. An example would be a dual socket machine, where the package
+in one of the sockets can be replaced while the system is running.
+
+This is not supported.
+
+In the arm64 world CPUs are not a single device but a slice of the system.
+There are no systems that support the physical addition (or removal) of CPUs
+while the system is running, and ACPI is not able to sufficiently describe
+them.
+
+e.g. New CPUs come with new caches, but the platform's cache toplogy is
+described in a static table, the PPTT. How caches are shared between CPUs is
+not discoverable, and must be described by firmware.
+
+e.g. The GIC redistributor for each CPU must be accessed by the driver during
+boot to discover the system wide supported features. ACPI's MADT GICC
+structures can describe a redistributor associated with a disabled CPU, but
+can't describe whether the redistributor is accessible, only that it is not
+'always on'.
+
+arm64's ACPI tables assume that everything described is ``present``.
+
+
+CPU Hotplug on virtual systems - CPUs not enabled at boot
+---------------------------------------------------------
+
+Virtual systems have the advantage that all the properties the system will
+ever have can be described at boot. There are no power-domain considerations
+as such devices are emulated.
+
+CPU Hotplug on virtual systems is supported. It is distinct from physical
+CPU Hotplug as all resources are described as ``present``, but CPUs may be
+marked as disabled by firmware. Only the CPU's online/offline behaviour is
+influenced by firmware. An example is where a virtual machine boots with a
+single CPU, and additional CPUs are added once a cloud orchestrator deploys
+the workload.
+
+For a virtual machine, the VMM (e.g. Qemu) plays the part of firmware.
+
+Virtual hotplug is implemented as a firmware policy affecting which CPUs can be
+brought online. Firmware can enforce its policy via PSCI's return codes. e.g.
+``DENIED``.
+
+The ACPI tables must describe all the resources of the virtual machine. CPUs
+that firmware wishes to disable either from boot (or later) should not be
+``enabled`` in the MADT GICC structures, but should have the ``online capable``
+bit set, to indicate they can be enabled later. The boot CPU must be marked as
+``enabled``. The 'always on' GICR structure must be used to describe the
+redistributors.
+
+CPUs described as ``online capable`` but not ``enabled`` can be set to enabled
+by the DSDT's Processor object's _STA method. On virtual systems the _STA method
+must always report the CPU as ``present``. Changes to the firmware policy can
+be notified to the OS via device-check or eject-request.
+
+CPUs described as ``enabled`` in the static table, should not have their _STA
+modified dynamically by firmware. Soft-restart features such as kexec will
+re-read the static properties of the system from these static tables, and
+may malfunction if these no longer describe the running system. Linux will
+re-discover the dynamic properties of the system from the _STA method later
+during boot.
diff --git a/Documentation/arm64/index.rst b/Documentation/arm64/index.rst
index ae21f8118830..54da62534871 100644
--- a/Documentation/arm64/index.rst
+++ b/Documentation/arm64/index.rst
@@ -13,6 +13,7 @@ ARM64 Architecture
asymmetric-32bit
booting
cpu-feature-registers
+ cpu-hotplug
elf_hwcaps
hugetlbpage
legacy_instructions
--
2.30.2
Powered by blists - more mailing lists