[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <Y90b7shHtOCQL3ma@kernel.org>
Date: Fri, 3 Feb 2023 11:36:30 -0300
From: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...nel.org>
To: Ian Rogers <irogers@...gle.com>
Cc: John Garry <john.g.garry@...cle.com>,
Will Deacon <will@...nel.org>,
James Clark <james.clark@....com>,
Mike Leach <mike.leach@...aro.org>,
Leo Yan <leo.yan@...aro.org>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>,
Alexander Shishkin <alexander.shishkin@...ux.intel.com>,
Jiri Olsa <jolsa@...nel.org>,
Namhyung Kim <namhyung@...nel.org>,
Adrian Hunter <adrian.hunter@...el.com>,
Kan Liang <kan.liang@...ux.intel.com>,
Kim Phillips <kim.phillips@....com>,
Florian Fischer <florian.fischer@...q.space>,
Ravi Bangoria <ravi.bangoria@....com>,
Xing Zhengjun <zhengjun.xing@...ux.intel.com>,
Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>,
Kang Minchul <tegongkang@...il.com>,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
linux-perf-users@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Sandipan Das <sandipan.das@....com>,
Jing Zhang <renyu.zj@...ux.alibaba.com>,
linuxppc-dev@...ts.ozlabs.org, Kajol Jain <kjain@...ux.ibm.com>,
Stephane Eranian <eranian@...gle.com>,
Perry Taylor <perry.taylor@...el.com>,
Caleb Biggers <caleb.biggers@...el.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1] perf pmu: Fix aarch64 build
Em Fri, Feb 03, 2023 at 11:35:29AM -0300, Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo escreveu:
> Em Fri, Feb 03, 2023 at 11:17:38AM -0300, Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo escreveu:
> > Em Thu, Feb 02, 2023 at 05:41:22PM -0800, Ian Rogers escreveu:
> > > On Thu, Feb 2, 2023 at 5:40 PM Ian Rogers <irogers@...gle.com> wrote:
> > > >
> > > > ARM64 overrides a weak function but a previous change had broken the
> > > > build.
> > > >
> > > > Fixes: 8cefeb8bd336 ("perf pmu-events: Introduce pmu_metrics_table")
> > >
> > > As 8cefeb8bd336 ("perf pmu-events: Introduce pmu_metrics_table") is
> > > only on tmp.perf/core then it may be best to just squash this fix into
> > > that.
> >
> > Yeah, that was my intention, I'll fold it there to keep bisection,
> > thanks for fixing it so fast, I'll double check on my rk3399 board and
> > on again on the cross-build container.
>
> Nope, that is not what I reported yesterday, trying to build it on the
> rk3399 board:
Sorry, pulled the trigger too soon, this is _before_ applying your fix,
I should't multitask too much :-\
I'll double check now,
- Arnaldo
Powered by blists - more mailing lists