linux-kernel - RE: [PATCH v3] vfio: fix deadlock between group lock and kvm lock

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Fri, 3 Feb 2023 14:48:26 +0000
From:   "Liu, Yi L" <yi.l.liu@...el.com>
To:     Matthew Rosato <mjrosato@...ux.ibm.com>,
        "alex.williamson@...hat.com" <alex.williamson@...hat.com>,
        "pbonzini@...hat.com" <pbonzini@...hat.com>,
        "jgg@...dia.com" <jgg@...dia.com>
CC:     "cohuck@...hat.com" <cohuck@...hat.com>,
        "farman@...ux.ibm.com" <farman@...ux.ibm.com>,
        "pmorel@...ux.ibm.com" <pmorel@...ux.ibm.com>,
        "borntraeger@...ux.ibm.com" <borntraeger@...ux.ibm.com>,
        "frankja@...ux.ibm.com" <frankja@...ux.ibm.com>,
        "imbrenda@...ux.ibm.com" <imbrenda@...ux.ibm.com>,
        "david@...hat.com" <david@...hat.com>,
        "akrowiak@...ux.ibm.com" <akrowiak@...ux.ibm.com>,
        "jjherne@...ux.ibm.com" <jjherne@...ux.ibm.com>,
        "pasic@...ux.ibm.com" <pasic@...ux.ibm.com>,
        "zhenyuw@...ux.intel.com" <zhenyuw@...ux.intel.com>,
        "Wang, Zhi A" <zhi.a.wang@...el.com>,
        "Christopherson,, Sean" <seanjc@...gle.com>,
        "Tian, Kevin" <kevin.tian@...el.com>,
        "linux-s390@...r.kernel.org" <linux-s390@...r.kernel.org>,
        "kvm@...r.kernel.org" <kvm@...r.kernel.org>,
        "intel-gvt-dev@...ts.freedesktop.org" 
        <intel-gvt-dev@...ts.freedesktop.org>,
        "intel-gfx@...ts.freedesktop.org" <intel-gfx@...ts.freedesktop.org>,
        "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: RE: [PATCH v3] vfio: fix deadlock between group lock and kvm lock

> From: Matthew Rosato <mjrosato@...ux.ibm.com>
> Sent: Friday, February 3, 2023 10:26 PM
> 
> On 2/3/23 3:58 AM, Liu, Yi L wrote:
> > Hi Matthew,
> >
> ...
> >> * Can't pass group->kvm to vfio_device_open, as it references the value
> >>   outside of new lock.  Pass device->kvm to minimize changes in this
> >>   fix (Alex, Yi)
> ...
> >> @@ -361,7 +420,6 @@ static int vfio_device_first_open(struct
> vfio_device
> >> *device,
> >>  	if (ret)
> >>  		goto err_module_put;
> >>
> >> -	device->kvm = kvm;
> >
> > Since you've deleted the only usage of kvm pointer in this function, I
> > guess you can remove the kvm parameter from vfio_device_open()
> > and vfio_device_first_open(). :-) if it makes this patch too big, may
> > just have another patch to do it.
> >
> 
> Hi Yi,
> 
> Yeah, I mentioned it briefly (and vaguely I guess) in the cover, that was
> intentionally left out to reduce the patch size since this is a fix.  I thought
> that was the consensus from the v2 comments anyway.
> 
> If I end up doing a v4 for this I can just include the removal as a 2nd patch
> (without a fixes tag) and Alex can squash or keep separate as preferred -- if
> not you can feel free to do that removal with your cdev follow-up that
> exploits this work.

Sure. 😊

Regards,
Yi Liu