[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <59630801-42b4-22e8-0ef6-5a5b8636dfbd@redhat.com>
Date: Fri, 3 Feb 2023 17:04:01 +0100
From: David Hildenbrand <david@...hat.com>
To: Matthew Wilcox <willy@...radead.org>,
Hyeonggon Yoo <42.hyeyoo@...il.com>
Cc: Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@...e.cz>, Christoph Lameter <cl@...ux.com>,
Pekka Enberg <penberg@...nel.org>,
David Rientjes <rientjes@...gle.com>,
Joonsoo Kim <iamjoonsoo.kim@....com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Roman Gushchin <roman.gushchin@...ux.dev>,
HORIGUCHI NAOYA(堀口 直也)
<naoya.horiguchi@....com>, Joe Perches <joe@...ches.com>,
Petr Mladek <pmladek@...e.com>,
Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com>,
linux-mm@...ck.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Alexander Potapenko <glider@...gle.com>,
Marco Elver <elver@...gle.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC v3 2/4] mm: move PG_slab flag to page_type
On 30.01.23 06:11, Matthew Wilcox wrote:
> On Mon, Jan 30, 2023 at 01:34:59PM +0900, Hyeonggon Yoo wrote:
>>> Seems like quite some changes to page_type to accomodate SLAB, which is
>>> hopefully going away soon(TM). Could we perhaps avoid that?
>>
>> If it could be done with less changes, I'll try to avoid that.
>
> Let me outline the idea I had for removing PG_slab:
>
> Observe that PG_reserved and PG_slab are mutually exclusive. Also,
I recall that there are SetPageReserved() calls on pages allocated via slab.
--
Thanks,
David / dhildenb
Powered by blists - more mailing lists