linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 5.4 000/134] 5.4.231-rc1 review

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <Y906Hz3UWYxoxYdD@kroah.com>
Date:   Fri, 3 Feb 2023 17:45:19 +0100
From:   Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To:     Guenter Roeck <linux@...ck-us.net>,
        Eric Biggers <ebiggers@...nel.org>
Cc:     stable@...r.kernel.org, patches@...ts.linux.dev,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, torvalds@...ux-foundation.org,
        akpm@...ux-foundation.org, shuah@...nel.org, patches@...nelci.org,
        lkft-triage@...ts.linaro.org, pavel@...x.de, jonathanh@...dia.com,
        f.fainelli@...il.com, sudipm.mukherjee@...il.com,
        srw@...dewatkins.net, rwarsow@....de
Subject: Re: [PATCH 5.4 000/134] 5.4.231-rc1 review

On Fri, Feb 03, 2023 at 07:56:19AM -0800, Guenter Roeck wrote:
> On Fri, Feb 03, 2023 at 11:11:45AM +0100, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> > This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 5.4.231 release.
> > There are 134 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> > to this one.  If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> > let me know.
> > 
> > Responses should be made by Sun, 05 Feb 2023 10:09:58 +0000.
> > Anything received after that time might be too late.
> > 
> 
> Building ia64:defconfig ... failed
> --------------
> Error log:
> <stdin>:1511:2: warning: #warning syscall clone3 not implemented [-Wcpp]
> arch/ia64/kernel/mca_drv.c: In function 'mca_handler_bh':
> arch/ia64/kernel/mca_drv.c:179:9: error: implicit declaration of function 'make_task_dead'
> 
> Caused by "exit: Add and use make_task_dead.". Did that really have to be backported ?

Yup, it does!

Eric, any help with this?

thanks,

greg k-h