linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 1/2] arm64: dts: exynos: drop mshc aliases

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <6c528b24aa94751d568d3b43bd00a4795964b3ae.camel@gmail.com>
Date:   Sat, 04 Feb 2023 13:45:15 +0100
From:   David Virag <virag.david003@...il.com>
To:     Henrik Grimler <henrik@...mler.se>, robh+dt@...nel.org,
        krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@...aro.org, alim.akhtar@...sung.com,
        m.szyprowski@...sung.com, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
        linux-samsung-soc@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        phone-devel@...r.kernel.org, ~postmarketos/upstreaming@...ts.sr.ht
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] arm64: dts: exynos: drop mshc aliases

On Sat, 2023-02-04 at 12:43 +0100, David Virag wrote:
> On Fri, 2023-02-03 at 21:39 +0100, Henrik Grimler wrote:
> > They are no longer needed after commit a13e8ef6008d ("mmc: dw_mmc:
> > exynos: use common_caps").
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Henrik Grimler <henrik@...mler.se>
> > ---
> >  arch/arm64/boot/dts/exynos/exynos5433-tm2-common.dtsi | 2 --
> >  arch/arm64/boot/dts/exynos/exynos7-espresso.dts       | 2 --
> >  2 files changed, 4 deletions(-)
[...]
> In dw_mmc-exynos.c, there's a caps array specified like this:
> 
> /* Common capabilities of Exynos4/Exynos5 SoC */
> static unsigned long exynos_dwmmc_caps[4] = {
>         MMC_CAP_1_8V_DDR | MMC_CAP_8_BIT_DATA,
>         0,
>         0,
>         0,
> };
> 
> As I understand these capabilities are added to the mmc controllers
> based on mshc alias id. Shouldn't these capabilities be moved to
> device-tree before removing these aliases? This also applies to the
> 32bit arm patch. If I understand correctly, removing these aliases
> without adding the capabilities to dt removes the capability
> "MMC_CAP_1_8V_DDR" and "MMC_CAP_8_BIT_DATA" from mshc_0/mmc_0.

Actually, it defaults to 0, so these capabilities will be added to all
mmc nodes, not just those with mshc0 alias. That may cause problems.


Best regards,
David