linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] kheaders: prefer gtar over tar for better compatibility

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <1416803D-E4E9-426B-8419-60251B8245B7@gentoo.org>
Date:   Sat, 4 Feb 2023 16:39:13 +0000
From:   Sam James <sam@...too.org>
To:     Michał Górny <mgorny@...too.org>,
        yamada.masahiro@...ionext.com
Cc:     Dmitry Goldin <dgoldin+lkml@...tonmail.ch>,
        linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        dist-kernel@...too.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] kheaders: prefer gtar over tar for better compatibility



> On 17 Jan 2023, at 19:01, Sam James <sam@...too.org> wrote:
> 
> 
> 
>> On 25 Dec 2022, at 16:33, Michał Górny <mgorny@...too.org> wrote:
>> 
>> On Sun, 2022-12-25 at 01:45 +0900, Masahiro Yamada wrote:
>>> Instead of inserting a workaround like this,
>>> another way is to allow users to override a variable
>>> from the command line.
>>> 
>>> 
>>> See the top Makefile, for example,
>>> 
>>> 
>>> AWK             = awk
>>> 
>>> 
>>> Then, users can do "make AWK=gawk"
>> 
>> I'm sorry but are you requesting that I remove the check and use $TAR
>> instead, or allow overriding with TAR, and fall back to gtar or tar
>> respectively?  If the former, should the script unconditionally assume
>> that TAR will be always set in the environment, or include fallback to
>> tar for when the script is run directly?
> 
> 
> Masahiro, what do you reckon? Thanks.
> 

Ping.

> Best,
> sam



Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (359 bytes)