linux-kernel - [PATCH] rcu/tree: Improve comments in rcu_report_qs

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <20230204022051.2737724-1-joel@joelfernandes.org>
Date:   Sat,  4 Feb 2023 02:20:50 +0000
From:   "Joel Fernandes (Google)" <joel@...lfernandes.org>
To:     linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc:     "Joel Fernandes (Google)" <joel@...lfernandes.org>,
        Qiang Zhang <Qiang1.zhang@...el.com>,
        Frederic Weisbecker <frederic@...nel.org>,
        Josh Triplett <josh@...htriplett.org>,
        Lai Jiangshan <jiangshanlai@...il.com>,
        Mathieu Desnoyers <mathieu.desnoyers@...icios.com>,
        "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@...nel.org>, rcu@...r.kernel.org,
        Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>,
        Boqun Feng <boqun.feng@...il.com>
Subject: [PATCH] rcu/tree: Improve comments in rcu_report_qs_rdp()

Recent discussion triggered due to a patch linked below, from Qiang,
shed light on the need to accelerate from QS reporting paths.

Update the comments to capture this piece of knowledge.

Link: https://lore.kernel.org/all/20230118073014.2020743-1-qiang1.zhang@intel.com/
Cc: Qiang Zhang <Qiang1.zhang@...el.com>
Cc: Frederic Weisbecker <frederic@...nel.org>
Signed-off-by: Joel Fernandes (Google) <joel@...lfernandes.org>

---
 kernel/rcu/tree.c | 13 ++++++++++++-
 1 file changed, 12 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/kernel/rcu/tree.c b/kernel/rcu/tree.c
index 93eb03f8ed99..713eb6ca6902 100644
--- a/kernel/rcu/tree.c
+++ b/kernel/rcu/tree.c
@@ -1983,7 +1983,12 @@ rcu_report_qs_rdp(struct rcu_data *rdp)
 	} else {
 		/*
 		 * This GP can't end until cpu checks in, so all of our
-		 * callbacks can be processed during the next GP.
+		 * callbacks can be processed during the next GP. Do
+		 * the acceleration from here otherwise there may be extra
+		 * grace period delays, as any accelerations from rcu_core()
+		 * or note_gp_changes() may happen only after the GP after the
+		 * current one has already started. Further, rcu_core()
+		 * only accelerates if RCU is idle (no GP in progress).
 		 *
 		 * NOCB kthreads have their own way to deal with that...
 		 */
@@ -1993,6 +1998,12 @@ rcu_report_qs_rdp(struct rcu_data *rdp)
 			/*
 			 * ...but NOCB kthreads may miss or delay callbacks acceleration
 			 * if in the middle of a (de-)offloading process.
+			 *
+			 * Such missed acceleration may cause the callbacks to
+			 * be stranded until RCU is fully de-offloaded, as
+			 * acceleration from rcu_core() and note_gp_changes()
+			 * cannot happen for fully/partially offloaded mode due
+			 * to ordering dependency between rnp lock and nocb_lock.
 			 */
 			needacc = true;
 		}
-- 
2.39.1.519.gcb327c4b5f-goog