[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <Y9+vkwYfQzYTbIIo@combine-ThinkPad-S1-Yoga>
Date: Sun, 5 Feb 2023 14:30:59 +0100
From: Guru Mehar Rachaputi <gurumeharrachaputi@...il.com>
To: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
Cc: Forest Bond <forest@...ttletooquiet.net>,
linux-staging@...ts.linux.dev, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3] staging: vt6655: Macro with braces issue change to
inline function
On Sun, Feb 05, 2023 at 02:16:07PM +0100, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> On Sun, Feb 05, 2023 at 02:08:02PM +0100, Guru Mehar Rachaputi wrote:
> > This patch is to fix checkpatch warning: "Macro argument 'iobase' may be better
> > as '(iobase)' to avoid precedence issues"
> >
> > ---
> > Changes in v3:
> > - Whitespace error from checkpatch fixed
> >
> > Changes in v2:
> > - Macros with one statement that is to call 'iowrite8' function changed
> > to inline function as reviewed by gregkh@...uxfoundation.org.
> > In relation to this, names of the callers of macro are also modified
> > to call this function.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Guru Mehar Rachaputi <gurumeharrachaputi@...il.com>
>
> Try to take this patch and apply it to a tree, and see that everything
> below the --- line is thrown away, including your signed-off-by: line :(
>
Sorry, should not a patch contain signed-off-by: line?
I did not understand.
--
Thanks & Regards,
Guru
Powered by blists - more mailing lists