[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20230205162156.zganuowqio4kva6o@treble>
Date: Sun, 5 Feb 2023 08:21:56 -0800
From: Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@...nel.org>
To: Michael Ellerman <mpe@...erman.id.au>
Cc: live-patching@...r.kernel.org, Nicholas Piggin <npiggin@...il.com>,
Christophe Leroy <christophe.leroy@...roup.eu>,
linuxppc-dev@...ts.ozlabs.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Song Liu <song@...nel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/2] powerpc: Fix livepatch module re-patching issue
On Sun, Feb 05, 2023 at 11:46:12AM +1100, Michael Ellerman wrote:
> Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@...nel.org> writes:
> > On Tue, Jan 24, 2023 at 07:38:03PM -0800, Josh Poimboeuf wrote:
> >> Fix a livepatch bug seen when reloading a patched module.
> >>
> >> This is the powerpc counterpart to Song Liu's fix for a similar issue on
> >> x86:
> >>
> >> https://lkml.kernel.org/lkml/20230121004945.697003-2-song@kernel.org
> >>
> >> Josh Poimboeuf (2):
> >> powerpc/module_64: Improve restore_r2() return semantics
> >> powerpc/module_64: Fix "expected nop" error on module re-patching
> >>
> >> arch/powerpc/kernel/module_64.c | 29 ++++++++++++++++++-----------
> >> 1 file changed, 18 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-)
> >
> > Hi Michael,
> >
> > Ping? Any objections to this?
> >
> > The x86 counterpart to this is queued for 6.3, it would be nice if this
> > also landed. We could take it through the livepatch tree if needed.
>
> It's in my next since about a week. Sorry I forgot to send the
> "accepted" emails (which I still don't have automated :/ ).
>
> 337251c7114e1 ("powerpc/module_64: Fix "expected nop" error on module re-patching")
Ah, I didn't think to look in -next. Thanks!
--
Josh
Powered by blists - more mailing lists