linux-kernel - linux-next: manual merge of the risc-v tree with Linus' tree

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20230206094823.48197098@canb.auug.org.au>
Date:   Mon, 6 Feb 2023 09:48:23 +1100
From:   Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>
To:     Palmer Dabbelt <palmer@...belt.com>, Paul Walmsley <paul@...an.com>
Cc:     Jisheng Zhang <jszhang@...nel.org>,
        Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        Linux Next Mailing List <linux-next@...r.kernel.org>,
        Palmer Dabbelt <palmer@...osinc.com>,
        Samuel Holland <samuel@...lland.org>
Subject: linux-next: manual merge of the risc-v tree with Linus' tree

Hi all,

Today's linux-next merge of the risc-v tree got a conflict in:

  arch/riscv/include/asm/vdso/processor.h

between commit:

  0b1d60d6dd9e ("riscv: Fix build with CONFIG_CC_OPTIMIZE_FOR_SIZE=y")

from Linus' tree and commit:

  95bc69a47be2 ("riscv: cpu_relax: switch to riscv_has_extension_likely()")

from the risc-v tree.

I fixed it up (the former removed the line modified by the latter,
so I just used the former) and can carry the fix as necessary. This
is now fixed as far as linux-next is concerned, but any non trivial
conflicts should be mentioned to your upstream maintainer when your tree
is submitted for merging.  You may also want to consider cooperating
with the maintainer of the conflicting tree to minimise any particularly
complex conflicts.

-- 
Cheers,
Stephen Rothwell

Content of type "application/pgp-signature" skipped