| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-ID: <CAOnJCUKn_pLKqYO71S6MrZd=rnTdSShZk+XksX2uxTiVtthmTA@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Sat, 4 Feb 2023 23:37:47 -0800
From: Atish Patra <atishp@...shpatra.org>
To: Andrew Jones <ajones@...tanamicro.com>
Cc: Atish Patra <atishp@...osinc.com>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Albert Ou <aou@...s.berkeley.edu>,
Anup Patel <anup@...infault.org>,
Eric Lin <eric.lin@...ive.com>, Guo Ren <guoren@...nel.org>,
Heiko Stuebner <heiko@...ech.de>,
kvm-riscv@...ts.infradead.org, kvm@...r.kernel.org,
linux-riscv@...ts.infradead.org,
Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>,
Palmer Dabbelt <palmer@...belt.com>,
Paul Walmsley <paul.walmsley@...ive.com>,
Will Deacon <will@...nel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 07/14] RISC-V: KVM: Add skeleton support for perf
On Fri, Feb 3, 2023 at 12:47 AM Atish Patra <atishp@...shpatra.org> wrote:
>
> On Thu, Feb 2, 2023 at 9:03 AM Andrew Jones <ajones@...tanamicro.com> wrote:
> >
> > On Wed, Feb 01, 2023 at 03:12:43PM -0800, Atish Patra wrote:
> > > This patch only adds barebone structure of perf implementation. Most of
> > > the function returns zero at this point and will be implemented
> > > fully in the future.
> > >
> > > Signed-off-by: Atish Patra <atishp@...osinc.com>
> > > ---
> > > arch/riscv/include/asm/kvm_host.h | 4 +
> > > arch/riscv/include/asm/kvm_vcpu_pmu.h | 78 +++++++++++++++
> > > arch/riscv/kvm/Makefile | 1 +
> > > arch/riscv/kvm/vcpu.c | 7 ++
> > > arch/riscv/kvm/vcpu_pmu.c | 136 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> > > 5 files changed, 226 insertions(+)
> > > create mode 100644 arch/riscv/include/asm/kvm_vcpu_pmu.h
> > > create mode 100644 arch/riscv/kvm/vcpu_pmu.c
> > >
> > > diff --git a/arch/riscv/include/asm/kvm_host.h b/arch/riscv/include/asm/kvm_host.h
> > > index 93f43a3..b90be9a 100644
> > > --- a/arch/riscv/include/asm/kvm_host.h
> > > +++ b/arch/riscv/include/asm/kvm_host.h
> > > @@ -18,6 +18,7 @@
> > > #include <asm/kvm_vcpu_insn.h>
> > > #include <asm/kvm_vcpu_sbi.h>
> > > #include <asm/kvm_vcpu_timer.h>
> > > +#include <asm/kvm_vcpu_pmu.h>
> > >
> > > #define KVM_MAX_VCPUS 1024
> > >
> > > @@ -228,6 +229,9 @@ struct kvm_vcpu_arch {
> > >
> > > /* Don't run the VCPU (blocked) */
> > > bool pause;
> > > +
> > > + /* Performance monitoring context */
> > > + struct kvm_pmu pmu_context;
> > > };
> > >
> > > static inline void kvm_arch_hardware_unsetup(void) {}
> > > diff --git a/arch/riscv/include/asm/kvm_vcpu_pmu.h b/arch/riscv/include/asm/kvm_vcpu_pmu.h
> > > new file mode 100644
> > > index 0000000..e2b4038
> > > --- /dev/null
> > > +++ b/arch/riscv/include/asm/kvm_vcpu_pmu.h
> > > @@ -0,0 +1,78 @@
> > > +/* SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0-only */
> > > +/*
> > > + * Copyright (c) 2023 Rivos Inc
> > > + *
> > > + * Authors:
> > > + * Atish Patra <atishp@...osinc.com>
> > > + */
> > > +
> > > +#ifndef __KVM_VCPU_RISCV_PMU_H
> > > +#define __KVM_VCPU_RISCV_PMU_H
> > > +
> > > +#include <linux/perf/riscv_pmu.h>
> > > +#include <asm/kvm_vcpu_sbi.h>
> > > +#include <asm/sbi.h>
> > > +
> > > +#ifdef CONFIG_RISCV_PMU_SBI
> > > +#define RISCV_KVM_MAX_FW_CTRS 32
> > > +
> > > +#if RISCV_KVM_MAX_FW_CTRS > 32
> > > +#error "Maximum firmware counter can't exceed 32 without increasing the RISCV_MAX_COUNTERS"
> >
> > "The number of firmware counters cannot exceed 32 without increasing RISCV_MAX_COUNTERS"
> >
> > > +#endif
> > > +
> > > +#define RISCV_MAX_COUNTERS 64
> >
> > But instead of that message, what I think we need is something like
> >
> > #define RISCV_KVM_MAX_HW_CTRS 32
> > #define RISCV_KVM_MAX_FW_CTRS 32
> > #define RISCV_MAX_COUNTERS (RISCV_KVM_MAX_HW_CTRS + RISCV_KVM_MAX_FW_CTRS)
> >
> > static_assert(RISCV_MAX_COUNTERS <= 64)
> >
> > And then in pmu_sbi_device_probe() should ensure
> >
> > num_counters <= RISCV_MAX_COUNTERS
> >
> > and pmu_sbi_get_ctrinfo() should ensure
> >
> > num_hw_ctr <= RISCV_KVM_MAX_HW_CTRS
> > num_fw_ctr <= RISCV_KVM_MAX_FW_CTRS
> >
> > which has to be done at runtime.
> >
>
> Sure. I will add the additional sanity checks.
>
As explained above, I feel we shouldn't mix the firmware number of
counters that the host gets and it exposes to a guest.
So I have not included this suggestion in the v5.
I have changed the num_fw_ctrs to PMU_FW_MAX though to accurately
reflect the firmware counters KVM is actually using.
I don't know if there is any benefit of static_assert over #error.
Please let me know if you feel strongly about that.
> > > +
> > > +/* Per virtual pmu counter data */
> > > +struct kvm_pmc {
> > > + u8 idx;
> > > + struct perf_event *perf_event;
> > > + uint64_t counter_val;
> > > + union sbi_pmu_ctr_info cinfo;
> > > + /* Event monitoring status */
> > > + bool started;
> > > +};
> > > +
> > > +/* PMU data structure per vcpu */
> > > +struct kvm_pmu {
> > > + struct kvm_pmc pmc[RISCV_MAX_COUNTERS];
> > > + /* Number of the virtual firmware counters available */
> > > + int num_fw_ctrs;
> > > + /* Number of the virtual hardware counters available */
> > > + int num_hw_ctrs;
> > > + /* A flag to indicate that pmu initialization is done */
> > > + bool init_done;
> > > + /* Bit map of all the virtual counter used */
> > > + DECLARE_BITMAP(pmc_in_use, RISCV_MAX_COUNTERS);
> > > +};
> > > +
> > > +#define vcpu_to_pmu(vcpu) (&(vcpu)->arch.pmu_context)
> > > +#define pmu_to_vcpu(pmu) (container_of((pmu), struct kvm_vcpu, arch.pmu_context))
> > > +
> > > +int kvm_riscv_vcpu_pmu_num_ctrs(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, struct kvm_vcpu_sbi_return *retdata);
> > > +int kvm_riscv_vcpu_pmu_ctr_info(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, unsigned long cidx,
> > > + struct kvm_vcpu_sbi_return *retdata);
> > > +int kvm_riscv_vcpu_pmu_ctr_start(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, unsigned long ctr_base,
> > > + unsigned long ctr_mask, unsigned long flag, uint64_t ival,
> > > + struct kvm_vcpu_sbi_return *retdata);
> > > +int kvm_riscv_vcpu_pmu_ctr_stop(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, unsigned long ctr_base,
> > > + unsigned long ctr_mask, unsigned long flag,
> > > + struct kvm_vcpu_sbi_return *retdata);
> > > +int kvm_riscv_vcpu_pmu_ctr_cfg_match(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, unsigned long ctr_base,
> > > + unsigned long ctr_mask, unsigned long flag,
> > > + unsigned long eidx, uint64_t evtdata,
> > > + struct kvm_vcpu_sbi_return *retdata);
> >
> > s/flag/flags/ for all the above prototypes and all the implementations
> > below.
> >
>
> Fixed.
>
> > > +int kvm_riscv_vcpu_pmu_ctr_read(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, unsigned long cidx,
> > > + struct kvm_vcpu_sbi_return *retdata);
> > > +void kvm_riscv_vcpu_pmu_init(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu);
> > > +void kvm_riscv_vcpu_pmu_deinit(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu);
> > > +void kvm_riscv_vcpu_pmu_reset(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu);
> > > +
> > > +#else
> > > +struct kvm_pmu {
> > > +};
> > > +
> > > +static inline void kvm_riscv_vcpu_pmu_init(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu) {}
> > > +static inline void kvm_riscv_vcpu_pmu_deinit(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu) {}
> > > +static inline void kvm_riscv_vcpu_pmu_reset(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu) {}
> > > +#endif /* CONFIG_RISCV_PMU_SBI */
> > > +#endif /* !__KVM_VCPU_RISCV_PMU_H */
> > > diff --git a/arch/riscv/kvm/Makefile b/arch/riscv/kvm/Makefile
> > > index 019df920..5de1053 100644
> > > --- a/arch/riscv/kvm/Makefile
> > > +++ b/arch/riscv/kvm/Makefile
> > > @@ -25,3 +25,4 @@ kvm-y += vcpu_sbi_base.o
> > > kvm-y += vcpu_sbi_replace.o
> > > kvm-y += vcpu_sbi_hsm.o
> > > kvm-y += vcpu_timer.o
> > > +kvm-$(CONFIG_RISCV_PMU_SBI) += vcpu_pmu.o
> > > diff --git a/arch/riscv/kvm/vcpu.c b/arch/riscv/kvm/vcpu.c
> > > index 7c08567..7d010b0 100644
> > > --- a/arch/riscv/kvm/vcpu.c
> > > +++ b/arch/riscv/kvm/vcpu.c
> > > @@ -138,6 +138,8 @@ static void kvm_riscv_reset_vcpu(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
> > > WRITE_ONCE(vcpu->arch.irqs_pending, 0);
> > > WRITE_ONCE(vcpu->arch.irqs_pending_mask, 0);
> > >
> > > + kvm_riscv_vcpu_pmu_reset(vcpu);
> > > +
> > > vcpu->arch.hfence_head = 0;
> > > vcpu->arch.hfence_tail = 0;
> > > memset(vcpu->arch.hfence_queue, 0, sizeof(vcpu->arch.hfence_queue));
> > > @@ -194,6 +196,9 @@ int kvm_arch_vcpu_create(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
> > > /* Setup VCPU timer */
> > > kvm_riscv_vcpu_timer_init(vcpu);
> > >
> > > + /* setup performance monitoring */
> > > + kvm_riscv_vcpu_pmu_init(vcpu);
> > > +
> > > /* Reset VCPU */
> > > kvm_riscv_reset_vcpu(vcpu);
> > >
> > > @@ -216,6 +221,8 @@ void kvm_arch_vcpu_destroy(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
> > > /* Cleanup VCPU timer */
> > > kvm_riscv_vcpu_timer_deinit(vcpu);
> > >
> > > + kvm_riscv_vcpu_pmu_deinit(vcpu);
> > > +
> > > /* Free unused pages pre-allocated for G-stage page table mappings */
> > > kvm_mmu_free_memory_cache(&vcpu->arch.mmu_page_cache);
> > > }
> > > diff --git a/arch/riscv/kvm/vcpu_pmu.c b/arch/riscv/kvm/vcpu_pmu.c
> > > new file mode 100644
> > > index 0000000..2dad37f
> > > --- /dev/null
> > > +++ b/arch/riscv/kvm/vcpu_pmu.c
> > > @@ -0,0 +1,136 @@
> > > +// SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0
> > > +/*
> > > + * Copyright (c) 2023 Rivos Inc
> > > + *
> > > + * Authors:
> > > + * Atish Patra <atishp@...osinc.com>
> > > + */
> > > +
> > > +#include <linux/errno.h>
> > > +#include <linux/err.h>
> > > +#include <linux/kvm_host.h>
> > > +#include <linux/perf/riscv_pmu.h>
> > > +#include <asm/csr.h>
> > > +#include <asm/kvm_vcpu_sbi.h>
> > > +#include <asm/kvm_vcpu_pmu.h>
> > > +#include <linux/kvm_host.h>
> > > +
> > > +#define kvm_pmu_num_counters(pmu) ((pmu)->num_hw_ctrs + (pmu)->num_fw_ctrs)
> > > +
> > > +int kvm_riscv_vcpu_pmu_num_ctrs(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, struct kvm_vcpu_sbi_return *retdata)
> > > +{
> > > + struct kvm_pmu *kvpmu = vcpu_to_pmu(vcpu);
> > > +
> > > + retdata->out_val = kvm_pmu_num_counters(kvpmu);
> > > +
> > > + return 0;
> > > +}
> > > +
> > > +int kvm_riscv_vcpu_pmu_ctr_info(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, unsigned long cidx,
> > > + struct kvm_vcpu_sbi_return *retdata)
> > > +{
> > > + struct kvm_pmu *kvpmu = vcpu_to_pmu(vcpu);
> > > +
> > > + if (cidx > RISCV_MAX_COUNTERS || cidx == 1) {
> > > + retdata->err_val = SBI_ERR_INVALID_PARAM;
> > > + return 0;
> > > + }
> > > +
> > > + retdata->out_val = kvpmu->pmc[cidx].cinfo.value;
> > > +
> > > + return 0;
> > > +}
> > > +
> > > +int kvm_riscv_vcpu_pmu_ctr_start(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, unsigned long ctr_base,
> > > + unsigned long ctr_mask, unsigned long flag, uint64_t ival,
> > > + struct kvm_vcpu_sbi_return *retdata)
> > > +{
> > > + /* TODO */
> > > + return 0;
> > > +}
> > > +
> > > +int kvm_riscv_vcpu_pmu_ctr_stop(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, unsigned long ctr_base,
> > > + unsigned long ctr_mask, unsigned long flag,
> > > + struct kvm_vcpu_sbi_return *retdata)
> > > +{
> > > + /* TODO */
> > > + return 0;
> > > +}
> > > +
> > > +int kvm_riscv_vcpu_pmu_ctr_cfg_match(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, unsigned long ctr_base,
> > > + unsigned long ctr_mask, unsigned long flag,
> > > + unsigned long eidx, uint64_t evtdata,
> > > + struct kvm_vcpu_sbi_return *retdata)
> > > +{
> > > + /* TODO */
> > > + return 0;
> > > +}
> > > +
> > > +int kvm_riscv_vcpu_pmu_ctr_read(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, unsigned long cidx,
> > > + struct kvm_vcpu_sbi_return *retdata)
> > > +{
> > > + /* TODO */
> > > + return 0;
> > > +}
> > > +
> > > +void kvm_riscv_vcpu_pmu_init(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
> > > +{
> > > + int i = 0, ret, num_hw_ctrs = 0, hpm_width = 0;
> > > + struct kvm_pmu *kvpmu = vcpu_to_pmu(vcpu);
> > > + struct kvm_pmc *pmc;
> > > +
> > > + ret = riscv_pmu_get_hpm_info(&hpm_width, &num_hw_ctrs);
> > > + if (ret < 0 || !hpm_width || !num_hw_ctrs)
> > > + return;
> > > +
> > > + /*
> > > + * It is guranteed that RISCV_KVM_MAX_FW_CTRS can't exceed 32 as
> > > + * that may exceed total number of counters more than RISCV_MAX_COUNTERS
> > > + */
> > > + kvpmu->num_hw_ctrs = num_hw_ctrs;
> > > + kvpmu->num_fw_ctrs = RISCV_KVM_MAX_FW_CTRS;
> >
> > If we sanity check that num_hw_ctrs <= 32 and num_fw_ctrs <= 32 at sbi_pmu
> > probe time, then we can also return num_fw_ctrs (or num_ctrs) along with
> > num_hw_ctrs from riscv_pmu_get_hpm_info(). Then, we can put the exact
> > number here into kvmpmu->num_fw_ctrs, rather than using its max.
> >
>
> The firmware counter information retrieved from PMU driver will be the
> number of firmware
> counter host supports (i.e. M-mode firmware supports). The number of
> counters supported for a
> guest is entirely up to the hypervisor. There shouldn't be any
> relation with the host's firmware counter.
>
> Looking at it again, we should probably set kvpmu->num_fw_ctrs to
> SBI_PMU_FW_MAX instead of RISCV_KVM_MAX_FW_CTRS.
> We already have a sanity check for SBI_PMU_FW_MAX in the code.
> > > +
> > > + /*
> > > + * There is no correlation between the logical hardware counter and virtual counters.
> > > + * However, we need to encode a hpmcounter CSR in the counter info field so that
> > > + * KVM can trap n emulate the read. This works well in the migration use case as
> > > + * KVM doesn't care if the actual hpmcounter is available in the hardware or not.
> > > + */
> > > + for (i = 0; i < kvm_pmu_num_counters(kvpmu); i++) {
> > > + /* TIME CSR shouldn't be read from perf interface */
> > > + if (i == 1)
> > > + continue;
> > > + pmc = &kvpmu->pmc[i];
> > > + pmc->idx = i;
> > > + if (i < kvpmu->num_hw_ctrs) {
> > > + pmc->cinfo.type = SBI_PMU_CTR_TYPE_HW;
> > > + if (i < 3)
> > > + /* CY, IR counters */
> > > + pmc->cinfo.width = 63;
> > > + else
> > > + pmc->cinfo.width = hpm_width;
> > > + /*
> > > + * The CSR number doesn't have any relation with the logical
> > > + * hardware counters. The CSR numbers are encoded sequentially
> > > + * to avoid maintaining a map between the virtual counter
> > > + * and CSR number.
> > > + */
> > > + pmc->cinfo.csr = CSR_CYCLE + i;
> > > + } else {
> > > + pmc->cinfo.type = SBI_PMU_CTR_TYPE_FW;
> > > + pmc->cinfo.width = BITS_PER_LONG - 1;
> > > + }
> > > + }
> > > +
> > > + kvpmu->init_done = true;
> > > +}
> > > +
> > > +void kvm_riscv_vcpu_pmu_deinit(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
> > > +{
> > > + /* TODO */
> > > +}
> > > +
> > > +void kvm_riscv_vcpu_pmu_reset(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
> > > +{
> > > + kvm_riscv_vcpu_pmu_deinit(vcpu);
> > > +}
> > > --
> > > 2.25.1
> > >
> >
> > Thanks,
> > drew
>
>
>
> --
> Regards,
> Atish
--
Regards,
Atish
Powered by blists - more mailing lists