linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v16 0/9] RISC-V IPI Improvements

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <86357k1ihd.wl-maz@kernel.org>
Date:   Sun, 05 Feb 2023 11:04:14 +0000
From:   Marc Zyngier <maz@...nel.org>
To:     Anup Patel <apatel@...tanamicro.com>
Cc:     Palmer Dabbelt <palmer@...belt.com>,
        Paul Walmsley <paul.walmsley@...ive.com>,
        Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
        Daniel Lezcano <daniel.lezcano@...aro.org>,
        Hector Martin <marcan@...can.st>,
        Sven Peter <sven@...npeter.dev>,
        Alyssa Rosenzweig <alyssa@...enzweig.io>,
        Atish Patra <atishp@...shpatra.org>,
        Alistair Francis <Alistair.Francis@....com>,
        Anup Patel <anup@...infault.org>,
        linux-riscv@...ts.infradead.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        asahi@...ts.linux.dev
Subject: Re: [PATCH v16 0/9] RISC-V IPI Improvements

On Tue, 03 Jan 2023 14:12:12 +0000,
Anup Patel <apatel@...tanamicro.com> wrote:
> 
> This series aims to improve IPI support in Linux RISC-V in following ways:
>  1) Treat IPIs as normal per-CPU interrupts instead of having custom RISC-V
>     specific hooks. This also makes Linux RISC-V IPI support aligned with
>     other architectures.
>  2) Remote TLB flushes and icache flushes should prefer local IPIs instead
>     of SBI calls whenever we have specialized hardware (such as RISC-V AIA
>     IMSIC and RISC-V SWI) which allows S-mode software to directly inject
>     IPIs without any assistance from M-mode runtime firmware.

[...]

I'm queuing patches 3 and 9 via the irqchip tree as they are
standalone.

For the rest, I need an Ack from the riscv maintainers as they change
a large amount of arch-specific code, and the couple of irqchip
patches depend on these changes.

Palmer, Paul?

Thanks,

	M.

-- 
Without deviation from the norm, progress is not possible.