lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <Y+FSqkDYfhKuBZIe@casper.infradead.org>
Date:   Mon, 6 Feb 2023 19:19:06 +0000
From:   Matthew Wilcox <willy@...radead.org>
To:     Marcelo Tosatti <mtosatti@...hat.com>
Cc:     Christoph Lameter <cl@...ux.com>,
        Aaron Tomlin <atomlin@...mlin.com>,
        Frederic Weisbecker <frederic@...nel.org>,
        Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-mm@...ck.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/5] mm/vmstat: use cmpxchg loop in cpu_vm_stats_fold

On Wed, Feb 01, 2023 at 04:50:16PM -0300, Marcelo Tosatti wrote:
> In preparation to switch vmstat shepherd to flush
> per-CPU counters remotely, use a cmpxchg loop 
> instead of a pair of read/write instructions.

FYI, try_cmpxchg() is preferred to plain cmpxchg() these days.
Apparently it generates better code on x86.

> -				v = pzstats->vm_stat_diff[i];
> -				pzstats->vm_stat_diff[i] = 0;
> +				do {
> +					v = pzstats->vm_stat_diff[i];
> +				} while (cmpxchg(&pzstats->vm_stat_diff[i], v, 0) != v);

I think this would be:

				do {
					v = pzstats->vm_stat_diff[i];
				} while (!try_cmpxchg(&pzstats->vm_stat_diff[i], v, 0));


Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ