[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <Y+FaEp2blurmgVlH@gallifrey>
Date: Mon, 6 Feb 2023 19:50:42 +0000
From: "Dr. David Alan Gilbert" <linux@...blig.org>
To: Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>
Cc: Dave Kleikamp <shaggy@...nel.org>,
Christian Brauner <brauner@...nel.org>,
Dave Chinner <dchinner@...hat.com>,
jfs-discussion@...ts.sourceforge.net, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-hardening@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] jfs: Use unsigned variable for length calculations
* Kees Cook (keescook@...omium.org) wrote:
> On Sat, Feb 04, 2023 at 08:25:45PM +0000, Dr. David Alan Gilbert wrote:
> > * Kees Cook (keescook@...omium.org) wrote:
> > > To avoid confusing the compiler about possible negative sizes, switch
> > > "ssize" which can never be negative from int to u32. Seen with GCC 13:
> > >
> > > ../fs/jfs/namei.c: In function 'jfs_symlink': ../include/linux/fortify-string.h:57:33: warning: '__builtin_memcpy' pointer overflow between offset 0 and size [-2147483648, -1]
> > > [-Warray-bounds=]
> > > 57 | #define __underlying_memcpy __builtin_memcpy
> > > | ^
> > > ...
> > > ../fs/jfs/namei.c:950:17: note: in expansion of macro 'memcpy'
> > > 950 | memcpy(ip->i_link, name, ssize);
> > > | ^~~~~~
> > >
> > > Cc: Dave Kleikamp <shaggy@...nel.org>
> > > Cc: Christian Brauner <brauner@...nel.org>
> > > Cc: Dave Chinner <dchinner@...hat.com>
> > > Cc: jfs-discussion@...ts.sourceforge.net
> > > Signed-off-by: Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>
> > > ---
> > > fs/jfs/namei.c | 6 +++---
> > > 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
> > >
> > > diff --git a/fs/jfs/namei.c b/fs/jfs/namei.c
> > > index b29d68b5eec5..494b9f4043cf 100644
> > > --- a/fs/jfs/namei.c
> > > +++ b/fs/jfs/namei.c
> > > @@ -876,7 +876,7 @@ static int jfs_symlink(struct mnt_idmap *idmap, struct inode *dip,
> > > tid_t tid;
> > > ino_t ino = 0;
> > > struct component_name dname;
> > > - int ssize; /* source pathname size */
> > > + u32 ssize; /* source pathname size */
> >
> > Had you considered using size_t - this is set from a strlen and used by a memcpy
> > that both talk size_t.
>
> I considered that, but I've had other maintainers upset about doubling
> the variable size.
I bet at least on some platforms it's cheaper as the 64 bit.
> I opted to keep the variable 32-bit here, so the
> machine code would only change to lose signed-ness.
Fair enough.
Dave
> -Kees
>
> --
> Kees Cook
--
-----Open up your eyes, open up your mind, open up your code -------
/ Dr. David Alan Gilbert | Running GNU/Linux | Happy \
\ dave @ treblig.org | | In Hex /
\ _________________________|_____ http://www.treblig.org |_______/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists