lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <Y+FgQXvnzSF1OrmO@slm.duckdns.org>
Date:   Mon, 6 Feb 2023 10:17:05 -1000
From:   Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>
To:     Will Deacon <will@...nel.org>
Cc:     Waiman Long <longman@...hat.com>,
        Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
        Zefan Li <lizefan.x@...edance.com>,
        Johannes Weiner <hannes@...xchg.org>,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, cgroups@...r.kernel.org,
        kernel-team@...roid.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] cgroup/cpuset: Don't filter offline CPUs in
 cpuset_cpus_allowed() for top cpuset tasks

Hello,

On Mon, Feb 06, 2023 at 11:05:41AM +0000, Will Deacon wrote:
> > If we want to get it into the next merge windows, there isn't much time left
> > for linux-next testing. So a lower risk solution is better from that
> > perspective too.
> 
> This needs to land for 6.2 to fix the regression. The next merge window is
> too late. That's why I cooked the reverts [1] as an alternative.

Yeah, I think Waiman meant before the coming merge window. We have at least
one more week so let's try the two patches and see how that goes. We can
always revert if it doesn't work out.

Thanks.

-- 
tejun

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ