linux-kernel - Re: Converting dev->mutex into dev->spinlock ?

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <Y+CNT5qpjrVMdvrY@kroah.com>
Date:   Mon, 6 Feb 2023 06:17:03 +0100
From:   Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To:     Hillf Danton <hdanton@...a.com>
Cc:     Alan Stern <stern@...land.harvard.edu>,
        Tetsuo Handa <penguin-kernel@...ove.sakura.ne.jp>,
        "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael@...nel.org>, linux-mm@...ck.org,
        LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        USB list <linux-usb@...r.kernel.org>,
        Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
Subject: Re: Converting dev->mutex into dev->spinlock ?

On Mon, Feb 06, 2023 at 10:56:29AM +0800, Hillf Danton wrote:
> On Sun, 5 Feb 2023 11:46:06 -0500 Alan Stern <stern@...land.harvard.edu>
> > 
> > And by the way, by disabling lockdep validation I am declaraing that 
> > enabling it would cause an overwhelming number of false positives, 
> 
> Could you share 5 false positives you see upstream to help understand how
> it is useless?

Please see this other email in this thread:
	https://lore.kernel.org/r/Y98FLlr7jkiFlV0k@rowland.harvard.edu