[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CANDhNCrG5zRZCFdz_k5fnsc8vqNbEu_9++qvR34FW_DXJcpVNA@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 6 Feb 2023 12:37:56 -0800
From: John Stultz <jstultz@...gle.com>
To: Davidlohr Bueso <dave@...olabs.net>
Cc: LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@...nel.org>,
Josh Triplett <josh@...htriplett.org>,
Joel Fernandes <joel@...lfernandes.org>,
Juri Lelli <juri.lelli@...hat.com>,
Valentin Schneider <vschneid@...hat.com>,
Dietmar Eggemann <dietmar.eggemann@....com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 4/4] locktorture: With nested locks, occasionally skip
main lock
On Sun, Feb 5, 2023 at 11:33 AM Davidlohr Bueso <dave@...olabs.net> wrote:
> On Fri, 03 Feb 2023, John Stultz wrote:
>
> >@@ -754,21 +755,28 @@ static int lock_torture_writer(void *arg)
> > schedule_timeout_uninterruptible(1);
> >
> > lockset_mask = torture_random(&rand);
> >+ skip_main_lock = nlocks && !(torture_random(&rand) % 100);
>
> For the sake of future readers of locktorture.c, this deserves a comment
> as to why we wanna skip the main lock (copy/paste from the changelog).
Good point! I'll send this update out soon.
Thanks again for the review and feedback!
-john
Powered by blists - more mailing lists