[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <TYCPR01MB84550C2753CC434A4A3A48ADE5DA9@TYCPR01MB8455.jpnprd01.prod.outlook.com>
Date: Mon, 6 Feb 2023 09:08:06 +0000
From: "Daisuke Matsuda (Fujitsu)" <matsuda-daisuke@...itsu.com>
To: 'Deming Wang' <wangdeming@...pur.com>,
"jgg@...pe.ca" <jgg@...pe.ca>, "leon@...nel.org" <leon@...nel.org>
CC: "linux-rdma@...r.kernel.org" <linux-rdma@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] RDMA/restrack: Correct spelling
On Mon, Feb 6, 2023 5:57 PM Deming Wang wrote:
>
> We should use this replace thie.
>
> Signed-off-by: Deming Wang <wangdeming@...pur.com>
> ---
> include/rdma/restrack.h | 2 +-
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/include/rdma/restrack.h b/include/rdma/restrack.h
> index 79d109c47242..d7ee54b7b9ae 100644
> --- a/include/rdma/restrack.h
> +++ b/include/rdma/restrack.h
> @@ -162,7 +162,7 @@ struct rdma_restrack_entry *rdma_restrack_get_byid(struct ib_device *dev,
> * rdma_restrack_no_track() - don't add resource to the DB
> * @res: resource entry
> *
> - * Every user of thie API should be cross examined.
> + * Every user of this API should be cross examined.
> * Probaby you don't need to use this function.
'Probably' instead of 'Probaby', right?
Daisuke
> */
> static inline void rdma_restrack_no_track(struct rdma_restrack_entry *res)
> --
> 2.27.0
Powered by blists - more mailing lists