[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <Y+DPnGN9l7Ix+TX7@osiris>
Date: Mon, 6 Feb 2023 10:59:56 +0100
From: Heiko Carstens <hca@...ux.ibm.com>
To: Guenter Roeck <linux@...ck-us.net>,
Wim Van Sebroeck <wim@...ux-watchdog.org>
Cc: linux-watchdog@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Alexander Egorenkov <egorenar@...ux.ibm.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/5] diag288 watchdog fixes and improvements
On Fri, Feb 03, 2023 at 08:39:53AM +0100, Alexander Egorenkov wrote:
> Minor code refactoring to improve readability of the driver,
> reduce code duplication and remove dead code.
>
> Alexander Egorenkov (5):
> watchdog: diag288_wdt: get rid of register asm
> watchdog: diag288_wdt: remove power management
> watchdog: diag288_wdt: unify command buffer handling for diag288 zvm
> watchdog: diag288_wdt: de-duplicate diag_stat_inc() calls
> watchdog: diag288_wdt: unify lpar and zvm diag288 helpers
>
> drivers/watchdog/diag288_wdt.c | 162 ++++++++-------------------------
> 1 file changed, 37 insertions(+), 125 deletions(-)
Guenter, Wim, how should this go upstream?
I can easily pick this up via the s390 tree for the next merge window.
Please let me know.
Thanks,
Heiko
Powered by blists - more mailing lists