[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <Y+DVqtfBRytURnov@kroah.com>
Date: Mon, 6 Feb 2023 11:25:46 +0100
From: Greg KH <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To: "D. Starke" <daniel.starke@...mens.com>
Cc: linux-serial@...r.kernel.org, jirislaby@...nel.org,
ilpo.jarvinen@...ux.intel.com, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 2/4] tty: n_gsm: add keep alive support
On Fri, Feb 03, 2023 at 03:50:21PM +0100, D. Starke wrote:
> From: Daniel Starke <daniel.starke@...mens.com>
>
> n_gsm is based on the 3GPP 07.010 and its newer version is the 3GPP 27.010.
> See https://portal.3gpp.org/desktopmodules/Specifications/SpecificationDetails.aspx?specificationId=1516
> The changes from 07.010 to 27.010 are non-functional. Therefore, I refer to
> the newer 27.010 here. Chapters 5.4.6.3.4 and 5.1.8.1.3 describe the test
> command which can be used to test the mux connection between both sides.
>
> Currently, no algorithm is implemented to make use of this command. This
> requires that each multiplexed upper layer protocol supervises the
> underlying muxer connection to handle possible connection losses.
>
> Introduce an ioctl commands and functions to optionally enable keep alive
> handling via the test command as described in chapter 5.4.6.3.4. A single
> incrementing octet is being used to distinguish between multiple retries.
> Retry count and interval are taken from the general parameters N2 and T2.
>
> Note that support for the test command is mandatory and already present in
> the muxer implementation since the very first version.
> Also note that the previous ioctl structure gsm_config cannot be extended
> due to missing checks against zero of the field "unused".
>
> Signed-off-by: Daniel Starke <daniel.starke@...mens.com>
> ---
> drivers/tty/n_gsm.c | 106 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-
> include/uapi/linux/gsmmux.h | 10 ++++
> 2 files changed, 114 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> v2 -> v3:
> Split previous patch 1/3 into two commits as recommended in the review.
> No other changes.
>
> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/all/Y9vYxgGd6kC+ZIgR@kroah.com/
>
> diff --git a/drivers/tty/n_gsm.c b/drivers/tty/n_gsm.c
> index 5783801d6524..d068df1cf2fd 100644
> --- a/drivers/tty/n_gsm.c
> +++ b/drivers/tty/n_gsm.c
> @@ -318,6 +318,11 @@ struct gsm_mux {
> struct gsm_control *pending_cmd;/* Our current pending command */
> spinlock_t control_lock; /* Protects the pending command */
>
> + /* Keep-alive */
> + struct timer_list ka_timer; /* Keep-alive response timer */
> + u8 ka_num; /* Keep-alive match pattern */
> + int ka_retries; /* Keep-alive retry counter */
> +
> /* Configuration */
> int adaption; /* 1 or 2 supported */
> u8 ftype; /* UI or UIH */
> @@ -325,6 +330,7 @@ struct gsm_mux {
> unsigned int t3; /* Power wake-up timer in seconds. */
> int n2; /* Retry count */
> u8 k; /* Window size */
> + u32 keep_alive; /* Control channel keep-alive in ms */
>
> /* Statistics (not currently exposed) */
> unsigned long bad_fcs;
> @@ -1897,11 +1903,13 @@ static void gsm_control_response(struct gsm_mux *gsm, unsigned int command,
> const u8 *data, int clen)
> {
> struct gsm_control *ctrl;
> + struct gsm_dlci *dlci;
> unsigned long flags;
>
> spin_lock_irqsave(&gsm->control_lock, flags);
>
> ctrl = gsm->pending_cmd;
> + dlci = gsm->dlci[0];
> command |= 1;
> /* Does the reply match our command */
> if (ctrl != NULL && (command == ctrl->cmd || command == CMD_NSC)) {
> @@ -1916,6 +1924,54 @@ static void gsm_control_response(struct gsm_mux *gsm, unsigned int command,
> /* Or did we receive the PN response to our PN command */
> } else if (command == CMD_PN) {
> gsm_control_negotiation(gsm, 0, data, clen);
> + /* Or did we receive the TEST response to our TEST command */
> + } else if (command == CMD_TEST && clen == 1 && *data == gsm->ka_num) {
> + gsm->ka_retries = -1; /* trigger new keep-alive message */
> + if (dlci && !dlci->dead)
> + mod_timer(&gsm->ka_timer,
> + jiffies + gsm->keep_alive * HZ / 100);
> + }
> + spin_unlock_irqrestore(&gsm->control_lock, flags);
> +}
> +
> +/**
> + * gsm_control_keep_alive - check timeout or start keep-alive
> + * @t: timer contained in our gsm object
> + *
> + * Called off the keep-alive timer expiry signaling that our link
> + * partner is not responding anymore. Link will be closed.
> + * This is also called to startup our timer.
> + */
> +
> +static void gsm_control_keep_alive(struct timer_list *t)
> +{
> + struct gsm_mux *gsm = from_timer(gsm, t, ka_timer);
> + unsigned long flags;
> +
> + spin_lock_irqsave(&gsm->control_lock, flags);
> + if (gsm->ka_num && gsm->ka_retries == 0) {
> + /* Keep-alive expired -> close the link */
> + if (debug & DBG_ERRORS)
> + pr_info("%s keep-alive timed out\n", __func__);
> + spin_unlock_irqrestore(&gsm->control_lock, flags);
> + if (gsm->dlci[0])
> + gsm_dlci_begin_close(gsm->dlci[0]);
> + return;
> + } else if (gsm->keep_alive && gsm->dlci[0] && !gsm->dlci[0]->dead) {
> + if (gsm->ka_retries > 0) {
> + /* T2 expired for keep-alive -> resend */
> + gsm->ka_retries--;
> + } else {
> + /* Start keep-alive timer */
> + gsm->ka_num++;
> + if (!gsm->ka_num)
> + gsm->ka_num++;
> + gsm->ka_retries = gsm->n2;
> + }
> + gsm_control_command(gsm, CMD_TEST, &gsm->ka_num,
> + sizeof(gsm->ka_num));
> + mod_timer(&gsm->ka_timer,
> + jiffies + gsm->t2 * HZ / 100);
> }
> spin_unlock_irqrestore(&gsm->control_lock, flags);
> }
> @@ -2061,8 +2117,10 @@ static void gsm_dlci_close(struct gsm_dlci *dlci)
> /* Ensure that gsmtty_open() can return. */
> tty_port_set_initialized(&dlci->port, false);
> wake_up_interruptible(&dlci->port.open_wait);
> - } else
> + } else {
> + del_timer(&dlci->gsm->ka_timer);
> dlci->gsm->dead = true;
> + }
> /* A DLCI 0 close is a MUX termination so we need to kick that
> back to userspace somehow */
> gsm_dlci_data_kick(dlci);
> @@ -2078,6 +2136,8 @@ static void gsm_dlci_close(struct gsm_dlci *dlci)
>
> static void gsm_dlci_open(struct gsm_dlci *dlci)
> {
> + struct gsm_mux *gsm = dlci->gsm;
> +
> /* Note that SABM UA .. SABM UA first UA lost can mean that we go
> open -> open */
> del_timer(&dlci->t1);
> @@ -2087,8 +2147,15 @@ static void gsm_dlci_open(struct gsm_dlci *dlci)
> if (debug & DBG_ERRORS)
> pr_debug("DLCI %d goes open.\n", dlci->addr);
> /* Send current modem state */
> - if (dlci->addr)
> + if (dlci->addr) {
> gsm_modem_update(dlci, 0);
> + } else {
> + /* Start keep-alive control */
> + gsm->ka_num = 0;
> + gsm->ka_retries = -1;
> + mod_timer(&gsm->ka_timer,
> + jiffies + gsm->keep_alive * HZ / 100);
> + }
> gsm_dlci_data_kick(dlci);
> wake_up(&dlci->gsm->event);
> }
> @@ -2840,6 +2907,7 @@ static void gsm_cleanup_mux(struct gsm_mux *gsm, bool disc)
> /* Finish outstanding timers, making sure they are done */
> del_timer_sync(&gsm->kick_timer);
> del_timer_sync(&gsm->t2_timer);
> + del_timer_sync(&gsm->ka_timer);
>
> /* Finish writing to ldisc */
> flush_work(&gsm->tx_work);
> @@ -2987,6 +3055,7 @@ static struct gsm_mux *gsm_alloc_mux(void)
> INIT_LIST_HEAD(&gsm->tx_data_list);
> timer_setup(&gsm->kick_timer, gsm_kick_timer, 0);
> timer_setup(&gsm->t2_timer, gsm_control_retransmit, 0);
> + timer_setup(&gsm->ka_timer, gsm_control_keep_alive, 0);
> INIT_WORK(&gsm->tx_work, gsmld_write_task);
> init_waitqueue_head(&gsm->event);
> spin_lock_init(&gsm->control_lock);
> @@ -3003,6 +3072,7 @@ static struct gsm_mux *gsm_alloc_mux(void)
> gsm->mru = 64; /* Default to encoding 1 so these should be 64 */
> gsm->mtu = 64;
> gsm->dead = true; /* Avoid early tty opens */
> + gsm->keep_alive = 0; /* Disabled */
>
> /* Store the instance to the mux array or abort if no space is
> * available.
> @@ -3138,6 +3208,28 @@ static int gsm_config(struct gsm_mux *gsm, struct gsm_config *c)
> return 0;
> }
>
> +static void gsm_copy_config_ext_values(struct gsm_mux *gsm,
> + struct gsm_config_ext *ce)
> +{
> + memset(ce, 0, sizeof(*ce));
> + ce->keep_alive = gsm->keep_alive;
> +}
> +
> +static int gsm_config_ext(struct gsm_mux *gsm, struct gsm_config_ext *ce)
> +{
> + unsigned int i;
> +
> + gsm->keep_alive = ce->keep_alive;
> + /*
> + * Check that userspace doesn't put stuff in here to prevent breakages
> + * in the future.
> + */
> + for (i = 0; i < ARRAY_SIZE(ce->reserved); i++)
> + if (ce->reserved[i])
> + return -EINVAL;
Do the check before you save off the keep_alive variable?
Sorry I missed this check before.
thanks,
greg k-h
Powered by blists - more mailing lists