[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <a9ab65a6-f750-7fd9-99ba-1cbd15427d2c@linux.intel.com>
Date: Mon, 6 Feb 2023 13:45:40 +0200 (EET)
From: Ilpo Järvinen <ilpo.jarvinen@...ux.intel.com>
To: Shaopeng Tan <tan.shaopeng@...fujitsu.com>
cc: Fenghua Yu <fenghua.yu@...el.com>,
Reinette Chatre <reinette.chatre@...el.com>,
Shuah Khan <shuah@...nel.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
linux-kselftest@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v6 4/5] selftests/resctrl: Cleanup properly when an error
occurs in CAT test
On Tue, 31 Jan 2023, Shaopeng Tan wrote:
> After creating a child process with fork() in CAT test, if an error
> occurs or a signal such as SIGINT is received, the parent process will
> be terminated immediately, and therefor the child process will not
> be killed and also resctrlfs is not unmounted.
>
> There is a signal handler registered in CMT/MBM/MBA tests, which kills
> child process, unmount resctrlfs, cleanups result files, etc., if a
> signal such as SIGINT is received.
>
> Commonize the signal handler registered for CMT/MBM/MBA tests and reuse
> it in CAT too.
>
> To reuse the signal handler, make the child process in CAT wait to be
> killed by parent process in any case (an error occurred or a signal was
> received), and when killing child process use global bm_pid instead of
> local bm_pid.
>
> Also, since the MBA/MBA/CMT/CAT are run in order, unregister the signal
> handler at the end of each test so that the signal handler cannot be
> inherited by other tests.
>
> Signed-off-by: Shaopeng Tan <tan.shaopeng@...fujitsu.com>
> ---
> tools/testing/selftests/resctrl/cat_test.c | 28 ++++----
> tools/testing/selftests/resctrl/fill_buf.c | 14 ----
> tools/testing/selftests/resctrl/resctrl.h | 2 +
> tools/testing/selftests/resctrl/resctrl_val.c | 70 +++++++++++++------
> 4 files changed, 68 insertions(+), 46 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/resctrl/cat_test.c b/tools/testing/selftests/resctrl/cat_test.c
> index 6a8306b0a109..3524fa88e3a4 100644
> --- a/tools/testing/selftests/resctrl/cat_test.c
> +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/resctrl/cat_test.c
> @@ -103,7 +103,6 @@ int cat_perf_miss_val(int cpu_no, int n, char *cache_type)
> unsigned long l_mask, l_mask_1;
> int ret, pipefd[2], sibling_cpu_no;
> char pipe_message;
> - pid_t bm_pid;
>
> cache_size = 0;
>
> @@ -181,28 +180,31 @@ int cat_perf_miss_val(int cpu_no, int n, char *cache_type)
> strcpy(param.filename, RESULT_FILE_NAME1);
> param.num_of_runs = 0;
> param.cpu_no = sibling_cpu_no;
> + } else {
> + ret = signal_handler_register();
> + if (ret) {
> + kill(bm_pid, SIGKILL);
> + goto out;
> + }
> }
>
> remove(param.filename);
>
> ret = cat_val(¶m);
> - if (ret)
> - return ret;
> -
> - ret = check_results(¶m);
> - if (ret)
> - return ret;
> + if (ret == 0)
> + ret = check_results(¶m);
It would be take this program flow fix out of the signal handler change
into a separate change.
--
i.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists