[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20230206115057.n37ea5rbqp44dkjo@orel>
Date: Mon, 6 Feb 2023 12:50:57 +0100
From: Andrew Jones <ajones@...tanamicro.com>
To: Atish Patra <atishp@...osinc.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Anup Patel <anup@...infault.org>,
Albert Ou <aou@...s.berkeley.edu>,
Atish Patra <atishp@...shpatra.org>,
Guo Ren <guoren@...nel.org>, Heiko Stuebner <heiko@...ech.de>,
kvm-riscv@...ts.infradead.org, kvm@...r.kernel.org,
linux-riscv@...ts.infradead.org,
Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>,
Palmer Dabbelt <palmer@...belt.com>,
Paul Walmsley <paul.walmsley@...ive.com>,
Will Deacon <will@...nel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 08/14] RISC-V: KVM: Add SBI PMU extension support
On Sat, Feb 04, 2023 at 05:15:09PM -0800, Atish Patra wrote:
> SBI PMU extension allows KVM guests to configure/start/stop/query about
> the PMU counters in virtualized enviornment as well.
>
> In order to allow that, KVM implements the entire SBI PMU extension.
>
> Reviewed-by: Anup Patel <anup@...infault.org>
> Signed-off-by: Atish Patra <atishp@...osinc.com>
> ---
> arch/riscv/kvm/Makefile | 2 +-
> arch/riscv/kvm/vcpu_sbi.c | 11 +++++
> arch/riscv/kvm/vcpu_sbi_pmu.c | 87 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> 3 files changed, 99 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> create mode 100644 arch/riscv/kvm/vcpu_sbi_pmu.c
>
> diff --git a/arch/riscv/kvm/Makefile b/arch/riscv/kvm/Makefile
> index 5de1053..278e97c 100644
> --- a/arch/riscv/kvm/Makefile
> +++ b/arch/riscv/kvm/Makefile
> @@ -25,4 +25,4 @@ kvm-y += vcpu_sbi_base.o
> kvm-y += vcpu_sbi_replace.o
> kvm-y += vcpu_sbi_hsm.o
> kvm-y += vcpu_timer.o
> -kvm-$(CONFIG_RISCV_PMU_SBI) += vcpu_pmu.o
> +kvm-$(CONFIG_RISCV_PMU_SBI) += vcpu_pmu.o vcpu_sbi_pmu.o
> diff --git a/arch/riscv/kvm/vcpu_sbi.c b/arch/riscv/kvm/vcpu_sbi.c
> index fe2897e..15fde15 100644
> --- a/arch/riscv/kvm/vcpu_sbi.c
> +++ b/arch/riscv/kvm/vcpu_sbi.c
> @@ -20,6 +20,16 @@ static const struct kvm_vcpu_sbi_extension vcpu_sbi_ext_v01 = {
> };
> #endif
>
> +#ifdef CONFIG_RISCV_PMU_SBI
> +extern const struct kvm_vcpu_sbi_extension vcpu_sbi_ext_pmu;
> +#else
> +static const struct kvm_vcpu_sbi_extension vcpu_sbi_ext_pmu = {
> + .extid_start = -1UL,
> + .extid_end = -1UL,
> + .handler = NULL,
> +};
> +#endif
> +
> static const struct kvm_vcpu_sbi_extension *sbi_ext[] = {
> &vcpu_sbi_ext_v01,
> &vcpu_sbi_ext_base,
> @@ -28,6 +38,7 @@ static const struct kvm_vcpu_sbi_extension *sbi_ext[] = {
> &vcpu_sbi_ext_rfence,
> &vcpu_sbi_ext_srst,
> &vcpu_sbi_ext_hsm,
> + &vcpu_sbi_ext_pmu,
> &vcpu_sbi_ext_experimental,
> &vcpu_sbi_ext_vendor,
> };
> diff --git a/arch/riscv/kvm/vcpu_sbi_pmu.c b/arch/riscv/kvm/vcpu_sbi_pmu.c
> new file mode 100644
> index 0000000..9fdc1e1
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/arch/riscv/kvm/vcpu_sbi_pmu.c
> @@ -0,0 +1,87 @@
> +// SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0
> +/*
> + * Copyright (c) 2023 Rivos Inc
> + *
> + * Authors:
> + * Atish Patra <atishp@...osinc.com>
> + */
> +
> +#include <linux/errno.h>
> +#include <linux/err.h>
> +#include <linux/kvm_host.h>
> +#include <asm/csr.h>
> +#include <asm/sbi.h>
> +#include <asm/kvm_vcpu_sbi.h>
> +
> +static int kvm_sbi_ext_pmu_handler(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, struct kvm_run *run,
> + struct kvm_vcpu_sbi_return *retdata)
> +{
> + int ret = 0;
> + struct kvm_cpu_context *cp = &vcpu->arch.guest_context;
> + struct kvm_pmu *kvpmu = vcpu_to_pmu(vcpu);
> + unsigned long funcid = cp->a6;
> + u64 temp;
> +
> + /* Return not supported if PMU is not initialized */
This comment isn't necessary, it's just stating what the code
clearly states.
> + if (!kvpmu->init_done) {
> + retdata->err_val = SBI_ERR_NOT_SUPPORTED;
> + return 0;
> + }
> +
> + switch (funcid) {
> + case SBI_EXT_PMU_NUM_COUNTERS:
> + ret = kvm_riscv_vcpu_pmu_num_ctrs(vcpu, retdata);
> + break;
> + case SBI_EXT_PMU_COUNTER_GET_INFO:
> + ret = kvm_riscv_vcpu_pmu_ctr_info(vcpu, cp->a0, retdata);
> + break;
> + case SBI_EXT_PMU_COUNTER_CFG_MATCH:
> +#if defined(CONFIG_32BIT)
> + temp = ((uint64_t)cp->a5 << 32) | cp->a4;
> +#else
> + temp = cp->a4;
> +#endif
> + /*
> + * This can fail if perf core framework fails to create an event.
> + * Forward the error to userspace because it's an error happened
^ which
> + * within the host kernel. The other option would be to convert
> + * this an SBI error and forward to the guest.
^ to
> + */
> + ret = kvm_riscv_vcpu_pmu_ctr_cfg_match(vcpu, cp->a0, cp->a1,
> + cp->a2, cp->a3, temp, retdata);
> + break;
> + case SBI_EXT_PMU_COUNTER_START:
> +#if defined(CONFIG_32BIT)
> + temp = ((uint64_t)cp->a4 << 32) | cp->a3;
> +#else
> + temp = cp->a3;
> +#endif
> + ret = kvm_riscv_vcpu_pmu_ctr_start(vcpu, cp->a0, cp->a1, cp->a2,
> + temp, retdata);
> + break;
> + case SBI_EXT_PMU_COUNTER_STOP:
> + ret = kvm_riscv_vcpu_pmu_ctr_stop(vcpu, cp->a0, cp->a1, cp->a2, retdata);
> + break;
> + case SBI_EXT_PMU_COUNTER_FW_READ:
> + ret = kvm_riscv_vcpu_pmu_ctr_read(vcpu, cp->a0, retdata);
> + break;
> + default:
> + retdata->err_val = SBI_ERR_NOT_SUPPORTED;
> + }
> +
> + return ret;
> +}
> +
> +static unsigned long kvm_sbi_ext_pmu_probe(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
> +{
> + struct kvm_pmu *kvpmu = vcpu_to_pmu(vcpu);
> +
> + return kvpmu->init_done;
> +}
> +
> +const struct kvm_vcpu_sbi_extension vcpu_sbi_ext_pmu = {
> + .extid_start = SBI_EXT_PMU,
> + .extid_end = SBI_EXT_PMU,
> + .handler = kvm_sbi_ext_pmu_handler,
> + .probe = kvm_sbi_ext_pmu_probe,
> +};
> --
> 2.25.1
>
Otherwise,
Reviewed-by: Andrew Jones <ajones@...tanamicro.com>
Thanks,
drew
Powered by blists - more mailing lists