| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-ID: <167569276573.4906.7991545915243537568.tip-bot2@tip-bot2>
Date: Mon, 06 Feb 2023 14:12:45 -0000
From: "tip-bot2 for Wander Lairson Costa" <tip-bot2@...utronix.de>
To: linux-tip-commits@...r.kernel.org
Cc: Wander Lairson Costa <wander@...hat.com>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>, stable@...r.kernel.org,
x86@...nel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: [tip: locking/urgent] rtmutex: Ensure that the top waiter is always woken up
The following commit has been merged into the locking/urgent branch of tip:
Commit-ID: db370a8b9f67ae5f17e3d5482493294467784504
Gitweb: https://git.kernel.org/tip/db370a8b9f67ae5f17e3d5482493294467784504
Author: Wander Lairson Costa <wander@...hat.com>
AuthorDate: Thu, 02 Feb 2023 09:30:20 -03:00
Committer: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
CommitterDate: Mon, 06 Feb 2023 14:49:13 +01:00
rtmutex: Ensure that the top waiter is always woken up
Let L1 and L2 be two spinlocks.
Let T1 be a task holding L1 and blocked on L2. T1, currently, is the top
waiter of L2.
Let T2 be the task holding L2.
Let T3 be a task trying to acquire L1.
The following events will lead to a state in which the wait queue of L2
isn't empty, but no task actually holds the lock.
T1 T2 T3
== == ==
spin_lock(L1)
| raw_spin_lock(L1->wait_lock)
| rtlock_slowlock_locked(L1)
| | task_blocks_on_rt_mutex(L1, T3)
| | | orig_waiter->lock = L1
| | | orig_waiter->task = T3
| | | raw_spin_unlock(L1->wait_lock)
| | | rt_mutex_adjust_prio_chain(T1, L1, L2, orig_waiter, T3)
spin_unlock(L2) | | | |
| rt_mutex_slowunlock(L2) | | | |
| | raw_spin_lock(L2->wait_lock) | | | |
| | wakeup(T1) | | | |
| | raw_spin_unlock(L2->wait_lock) | | | |
| | | | waiter = T1->pi_blocked_on
| | | | waiter == rt_mutex_top_waiter(L2)
| | | | waiter->task == T1
| | | | raw_spin_lock(L2->wait_lock)
| | | | dequeue(L2, waiter)
| | | | update_prio(waiter, T1)
| | | | enqueue(L2, waiter)
| | | | waiter != rt_mutex_top_waiter(L2)
| | | | L2->owner == NULL
| | | | wakeup(T1)
| | | | raw_spin_unlock(L2->wait_lock)
T1 wakes up
T1 != top_waiter(L2)
schedule_rtlock()
If the deadline of T1 is updated before the call to update_prio(), and the
new deadline is greater than the deadline of the second top waiter, then
after the requeue, T1 is no longer the top waiter, and the wrong task is
woken up which will then go back to sleep because it is not the top waiter.
This can be reproduced in PREEMPT_RT with stress-ng:
while true; do
stress-ng --sched deadline --sched-period 1000000000 \
--sched-runtime 800000000 --sched-deadline \
1000000000 --mmapfork 23 -t 20
done
A similar issue was pointed out by Thomas versus the cases where the top
waiter drops out early due to a signal or timeout, which is a general issue
for all regular rtmutex use cases, e.g. futex.
The problematic code is in rt_mutex_adjust_prio_chain():
// Save the top waiter before dequeue/enqueue
prerequeue_top_waiter = rt_mutex_top_waiter(lock);
rt_mutex_dequeue(lock, waiter);
waiter_update_prio(waiter, task);
rt_mutex_enqueue(lock, waiter);
// Lock has no owner?
if (!rt_mutex_owner(lock)) {
// Top waiter changed
----> if (prerequeue_top_waiter != rt_mutex_top_waiter(lock))
----> wake_up_state(waiter->task, waiter->wake_state);
This only takes the case into account where @waiter is the new top waiter
due to the requeue operation.
But it fails to handle the case where @waiter is not longer the top
waiter due to the requeue operation.
Ensure that the new top waiter is woken up so in all cases so it can take
over the ownerless lock.
[ tglx: Amend changelog, add Fixes tag ]
Fixes: c014ef69b3ac ("locking/rtmutex: Add wake_state to rt_mutex_waiter")
Signed-off-by: Wander Lairson Costa <wander@...hat.com>
Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
Cc: stable@...r.kernel.org
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230117172649.52465-1-wander@redhat.com
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230202123020.14844-1-wander@redhat.com
---
kernel/locking/rtmutex.c | 5 +++--
1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/kernel/locking/rtmutex.c b/kernel/locking/rtmutex.c
index 010cf4e..728f434 100644
--- a/kernel/locking/rtmutex.c
+++ b/kernel/locking/rtmutex.c
@@ -901,8 +901,9 @@ static int __sched rt_mutex_adjust_prio_chain(struct task_struct *task,
* then we need to wake the new top waiter up to try
* to get the lock.
*/
- if (prerequeue_top_waiter != rt_mutex_top_waiter(lock))
- wake_up_state(waiter->task, waiter->wake_state);
+ top_waiter = rt_mutex_top_waiter(lock);
+ if (prerequeue_top_waiter != top_waiter)
+ wake_up_state(top_waiter->task, top_waiter->wake_state);
raw_spin_unlock_irq(&lock->wait_lock);
return 0;
}
Powered by blists - more mailing lists