[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <Y+EPs2EQEevzhpvB@osiris>
Date: Mon, 6 Feb 2023 15:33:23 +0100
From: Heiko Carstens <hca@...ux.ibm.com>
To: Guenter Roeck <linux@...ck-us.net>
Cc: Wim Van Sebroeck <wim@...ux-watchdog.org>,
linux-watchdog@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Alexander Egorenkov <egorenar@...ux.ibm.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/5] diag288 watchdog fixes and improvements
On Mon, Feb 06, 2023 at 05:55:40AM -0800, Guenter Roeck wrote:
> On 2/6/23 01:59, Heiko Carstens wrote:
> > On Fri, Feb 03, 2023 at 08:39:53AM +0100, Alexander Egorenkov wrote:
> > > Minor code refactoring to improve readability of the driver,
> > > reduce code duplication and remove dead code.
> > >
> > > Alexander Egorenkov (5):
> > > watchdog: diag288_wdt: get rid of register asm
> > > watchdog: diag288_wdt: remove power management
> > > watchdog: diag288_wdt: unify command buffer handling for diag288 zvm
> > > watchdog: diag288_wdt: de-duplicate diag_stat_inc() calls
> > > watchdog: diag288_wdt: unify lpar and zvm diag288 helpers
> > >
> > > drivers/watchdog/diag288_wdt.c | 162 ++++++++-------------------------
> > > 1 file changed, 37 insertions(+), 125 deletions(-)
> >
> > Guenter, Wim, how should this go upstream?
> >
> > I can easily pick this up via the s390 tree for the next merge window.
> > Please let me know.
>
> I have it currently in my watchdog-next tree, but that is not in linux-next.
> Fine with me to go through the s390 tree.
Applied to s390 tree - should be in next linux-next release.
Thank you!
Powered by blists - more mailing lists