lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <8e493d2f-827a-03d9-610b-6246502bf92a@linux.intel.com>
Date:   Mon, 6 Feb 2023 10:17:46 -0500
From:   "Liang, Kan" <kan.liang@...ux.intel.com>
To:     Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...nel.org>
Cc:     peterz@...radead.org, mingo@...hat.com,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, ak@...ux.intel.com,
        eranian@...gle.com, irogers@...gle.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH V3 3/3] perf test: Support the retire_lat check



On 2023-02-06 10:01 a.m., Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo wrote:
> Em Thu, Feb 02, 2023 at 11:22:09AM -0800, kan.liang@...ux.intel.com escreveu:
>> From: Kan Liang <kan.liang@...ux.intel.com>
>>
>> Add test for the new field for Retire Latency in the X86 specific test.
> 
> Is this passing 'perf test' for you?

Ah, it should be the original V2 missed the below change.

@@ -100,5 +101,25 @@ void arch_perf_synthesize_sample_weight(const
struct perf_sample *data,
 	if (type & PERF_SAMPLE_WEIGHT_STRUCT) {
 		*array &= 0xffffffff;
 		*array |= ((u64)data->ins_lat << 32);
+		*array |= ((u64)data->retire_lat << 48);
 	}
 }

Could you please remove the V2 and re-apply the V3?

$ sudo ./perf test -v "x86 sample parsing"
 74: x86 Sample parsing                                              :
--- start ---
test child forked, pid 3316797
test child finished with 0
---- end ----
x86 Sample parsing: Ok


Thanks,
Kan

> 
> [root@...co ~]# perf test -v "x86 sample parsing"
>  74: x86 Sample parsing                                              :
> --- start ---
> test child forked, pid 72526
> Samples differ at 'retire_lat'
> parsing failed for sample_type 0x1000000
> test child finished with -1
> ---- end ----
> x86 Sample parsing: FAILED!
> [root@...co ~]#
> 
> - Arnaldo
>  
>> Signed-off-by: Kan Liang <kan.liang@...ux.intel.com>
>> ---
>>
>> New patch since V2
>>
>>  tools/perf/arch/x86/tests/sample-parsing.c | 5 ++++-
>>  1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/tools/perf/arch/x86/tests/sample-parsing.c b/tools/perf/arch/x86/tests/sample-parsing.c
>> index 690c7c07e90d..a061e8619267 100644
>> --- a/tools/perf/arch/x86/tests/sample-parsing.c
>> +++ b/tools/perf/arch/x86/tests/sample-parsing.c
>> @@ -27,8 +27,10 @@ static bool samples_same(const struct perf_sample *s1,
>>  			 const struct perf_sample *s2,
>>  			 u64 type)
>>  {
>> -	if (type & PERF_SAMPLE_WEIGHT_STRUCT)
>> +	if (type & PERF_SAMPLE_WEIGHT_STRUCT) {
>>  		COMP(ins_lat);
>> +		COMP(retire_lat);
>> +	}
>>  
>>  	return true;
>>  }
>> @@ -48,6 +50,7 @@ static int do_test(u64 sample_type)
>>  	struct perf_sample sample = {
>>  		.weight		= 101,
>>  		.ins_lat        = 102,
>> +		.retire_lat     = 103,
>>  	};
>>  	struct perf_sample sample_out;
>>  	size_t i, sz, bufsz;
>> -- 
>> 2.35.1
>>
> 

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ