[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <Y+Ed7823ZSXevwA6@kernel.org>
Date: Mon, 6 Feb 2023 12:34:07 -0300
From: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...nel.org>
To: "Liang, Kan" <kan.liang@...ux.intel.com>
Cc: peterz@...radead.org, mingo@...hat.com,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, ak@...ux.intel.com,
eranian@...gle.com, irogers@...gle.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH V3 3/3] perf test: Support the retire_lat check
Em Mon, Feb 06, 2023 at 12:32:54PM -0300, Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo escreveu:
> Em Mon, Feb 06, 2023 at 10:17:46AM -0500, Liang, Kan escreveu:
> >
> >
> > On 2023-02-06 10:01 a.m., Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo wrote:
> > > Em Thu, Feb 02, 2023 at 11:22:09AM -0800, kan.liang@...ux.intel.com escreveu:
> > >> From: Kan Liang <kan.liang@...ux.intel.com>
> > >>
> > >> Add test for the new field for Retire Latency in the X86 specific test.
> > >
> > > Is this passing 'perf test' for you?
> >
> > Ah, it should be the original V2 missed the below change.
>
> Can you please send this as a separate patch as I already merged
> torvalds/master and added more csets on top, so to just fix it and
> force push now would be bad.
>
> Please use what is in my perf/core branch and add a Fixes for that v2
> patch.
BTW, the 3rd patch with the test is already on the tmp.perf/core branch,
that will move to perf/core after the next round of container build
tests.
- Arnaldo
> Thanks,
>
> - Arnaldo
>
> > @@ -100,5 +101,25 @@ void arch_perf_synthesize_sample_weight(const
> > struct perf_sample *data,
> > if (type & PERF_SAMPLE_WEIGHT_STRUCT) {
> > *array &= 0xffffffff;
> > *array |= ((u64)data->ins_lat << 32);
> > + *array |= ((u64)data->retire_lat << 48);
> > }
> > }
> >
> > Could you please remove the V2 and re-apply the V3?
>
> > $ sudo ./perf test -v "x86 sample parsing"
> > 74: x86 Sample parsing :
> > --- start ---
> > test child forked, pid 3316797
> > test child finished with 0
> > ---- end ----
> > x86 Sample parsing: Ok
> >
> >
> > Thanks,
> > Kan
> >
> > >
> > > [root@...co ~]# perf test -v "x86 sample parsing"
> > > 74: x86 Sample parsing :
> > > --- start ---
> > > test child forked, pid 72526
> > > Samples differ at 'retire_lat'
> > > parsing failed for sample_type 0x1000000
> > > test child finished with -1
> > > ---- end ----
> > > x86 Sample parsing: FAILED!
> > > [root@...co ~]#
> > >
> > > - Arnaldo
> > >
> > >> Signed-off-by: Kan Liang <kan.liang@...ux.intel.com>
> > >> ---
> > >>
> > >> New patch since V2
> > >>
> > >> tools/perf/arch/x86/tests/sample-parsing.c | 5 ++++-
> > >> 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> > >>
> > >> diff --git a/tools/perf/arch/x86/tests/sample-parsing.c b/tools/perf/arch/x86/tests/sample-parsing.c
> > >> index 690c7c07e90d..a061e8619267 100644
> > >> --- a/tools/perf/arch/x86/tests/sample-parsing.c
> > >> +++ b/tools/perf/arch/x86/tests/sample-parsing.c
> > >> @@ -27,8 +27,10 @@ static bool samples_same(const struct perf_sample *s1,
> > >> const struct perf_sample *s2,
> > >> u64 type)
> > >> {
> > >> - if (type & PERF_SAMPLE_WEIGHT_STRUCT)
> > >> + if (type & PERF_SAMPLE_WEIGHT_STRUCT) {
> > >> COMP(ins_lat);
> > >> + COMP(retire_lat);
> > >> + }
> > >>
> > >> return true;
> > >> }
> > >> @@ -48,6 +50,7 @@ static int do_test(u64 sample_type)
> > >> struct perf_sample sample = {
> > >> .weight = 101,
> > >> .ins_lat = 102,
> > >> + .retire_lat = 103,
> > >> };
> > >> struct perf_sample sample_out;
> > >> size_t i, sz, bufsz;
> > >> --
> > >> 2.35.1
> > >>
> > >
>
> --
>
> - Arnaldo
--
- Arnaldo
Powered by blists - more mailing lists