[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <Y+G3lDu3UPFZcFE0@casper.infradead.org>
Date: Tue, 7 Feb 2023 02:29:40 +0000
From: Matthew Wilcox <willy@...radead.org>
To: David Stevens <stevensd@...omium.org>
Cc: Peter Xu <peterx@...hat.com>, linux-mm@...ck.org,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
"Kirill A . Shutemov" <kirill@...temov.name>,
Yang Shi <shy828301@...il.com>,
David Hildenbrand <david@...hat.com>,
Hugh Dickins <hughd@...gle.com>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] mm/khugepaged: skip shmem with userfaultfd
On Tue, Feb 07, 2023 at 10:37:06AM +0900, David Stevens wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 7, 2023 at 6:50 AM Matthew Wilcox <willy@...radead.org> wrote:
> > On Mon, Feb 06, 2023 at 03:52:19PM -0500, Peter Xu wrote:
> > > The problem is khugepaged will release pgtable lock during collapsing, so
> > > AFAICT there can be a race where some other thread tries to insert pages
> > > into page cache in parallel with khugepaged right after khugepaged released
> > > the page cache lock.
> > >
> > > For example, it seems to me new page cache can be inserted when khugepaged
> > > is copying small page content to the new hpage.
>
> This particular race can't happen with either patch, since the missing
> page cache entries are filled when we create the multi-index entry for
> hpage.
Can too.
for (index = start; index < end; index++) {
...
if (xa_is_value(page) || !PageUptodate(page)) {
xas_unlock_irq(&xas);
/* swap in or instantiate fallocated page */
if (shmem_get_folio(mapping->host, index,
&folio, SGP_NOALLOC)) {
result = SCAN_FAIL;
goto xa_unlocked;
}
...
So we start the iteration, and then a page fault happens in one of
the indices we've already examined, but we don't have the page on
the list. It's a nice wide race too because we're bringing the
page in from swap.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists