linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] rfkill: Use sysfs_emit() to instead of sprintf()

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Tue, 7 Feb 2023 17:07:28 +0100
From:   Simon Horman <simon.horman@...igine.com>
To:     Kalle Valo <kvalo@...nel.org>
Cc:     Bo Liu <liubo03@...pur.com>, johannes@...solutions.net,
        davem@...emloft.net, edumazet@...gle.com, kuba@...nel.org,
        pabeni@...hat.com, linux-wireless@...r.kernel.org,
        netdev@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] rfkill: Use sysfs_emit() to instead of sprintf()

On Tue, Feb 07, 2023 at 05:09:02PM +0200, Kalle Valo wrote:
> Simon Horman <simon.horman@...igine.com> writes:
> 
> > Hi Bo Liu,
> >
> > On Wed, Feb 01, 2023 at 03:17:18AM -0500, Bo Liu wrote:
> >> Follow the advice of the Documentation/filesystems/sysfs.rst and show()
> >> should only use sysfs_emit() or sysfs_emit_at() when formatting the
> >> value to be returned to user space.
> >
> > Thanks for your patch. As it is not a bug fix it should be targeted at
> > 'net-next' (as opposed to 'net'). This should be specified in the patch
> > subject something like this:
> >
> > [PATCH net-next v2] rfkill: Use sysfs_emit() to instead of sprintf()
> 
> rfkill patches should go to wireless-next, right?

Yes, my bad.