[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <f3ee2ae4-a2b4-4dc0-832d-43e5223ad862@linux.ibm.com>
Date: Tue, 7 Feb 2023 17:18:24 +0100
From: Janosch Frank <frankja@...ux.ibm.com>
To: Janis Schoetterl-Glausch <scgl@...ux.ibm.com>,
Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@...ux.ibm.com>,
Claudio Imbrenda <imbrenda@...ux.ibm.com>,
Heiko Carstens <hca@...ux.ibm.com>,
Vasily Gorbik <gor@...ux.ibm.com>,
Alexander Gordeev <agordeev@...ux.ibm.com>
Cc: David Hildenbrand <david@...hat.com>,
Jonathan Corbet <corbet@....net>, kvm@...r.kernel.org,
linux-doc@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kselftest@...r.kernel.org, linux-s390@...r.kernel.org,
Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@...hat.com>,
Shuah Khan <shuah@...nel.org>,
Sven Schnelle <svens@...ux.ibm.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v7 14/14] KVM: s390: selftest: memop: Add cmpxchg tests
On 2/6/23 17:46, Janis Schoetterl-Glausch wrote:
> Test successful exchange, unsuccessful exchange, storage key protection
> and invalid arguments.
>
> Signed-off-by: Janis Schoetterl-Glausch <scgl@...ux.ibm.com>
I've had checkpatch have a look at this and there's an extra \n and a
else after a return as well as a false-positive.
Could you provide me with a fixed patch as a reply to this mail?
Powered by blists - more mailing lists