linux-kernel - RE: [External] : RE: [EXT] [PATCH v2 1/1] PCI: layerscape: Add EP mode support for ls1028a

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <HE1PR0401MB2331634B29ED9EDAB032B73888DB9@HE1PR0401MB2331.eurprd04.prod.outlook.com>
Date:   Tue, 7 Feb 2023 16:20:21 +0000
From:   Frank Li <frank.li@....com>
To:     ALOK TIWARI <alok.a.tiwari@...cle.com>,
        "M.H. Lian" <minghuan.lian@....com>,
        Mingkai Hu <mingkai.hu@....com>, Roy Zang <roy.zang@....com>,
        Lorenzo Pieralisi <lpieralisi@...nel.org>,
        Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>,
        Krzysztof Wilczyński <kw@...ux.com>,
        Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@...gle.com>,
        "open list:PCI DRIVER FOR FREESCALE LAYERSCAPE" 
        <linuxppc-dev@...ts.ozlabs.org>,
        "open list:PCI DRIVER FOR FREESCALE LAYERSCAPE" 
        <linux-pci@...r.kernel.org>,
        "moderated list:PCI DRIVER FOR FREESCALE LAYERSCAPE" 
        <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
        open list <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
CC:     "imx@...ts.linux.dev" <imx@...ts.linux.dev>
Subject: RE: [External] : RE: [EXT] [PATCH v2 1/1] PCI: layerscape: Add EP
 mode support for ls1028a

> Subject: Re: [External] : RE: [EXT] [PATCH v2 1/1] PCI: layerscape: Add EP
> mode support for ls1028a
> 
> Caution: EXT Email
> 
>          { .compatible = "fsl,ls1046a-pcie-ep", .data = &ls1_ep_drvdata },
> +       { .compatible = "fsl,ls1028a-pcie-ep", .data = &ls1_ep_drvdata },
>         { .compatible = "fsl,ls1088a-pcie-ep", .data = &ls2_ep_drvdata },
> 
> can it be like this for better readability. ?

It is just chip name and follow name conversion, which already upstreamed and documented. 
Why do you think it not is good readability? 

Frank Li 

> 
> Thanks,
> Alok
>