[<prev] [next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <Y+J7QrS7JqeNqbot@itl-email>
Date: Tue, 7 Feb 2023 11:24:26 -0500
From: Demi Marie Obenour <demi@...isiblethingslab.com>
To: Joe Thornber <thornber@...hat.com>
Cc: Alasdair Kergon <agk@...hat.com>,
Mike Snitzer <snitzer@...nel.org>, dm-devel@...hat.com,
Marek Marczykowski-Górecki
<marmarek@...isiblethingslab.com>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [dm-devel] [PATCH 2/2] dm-thin: Allow specifying an offset
On Tue, Feb 07, 2023 at 03:03:57PM +0000, Joe Thornber wrote:
> Nack. I'm not building a linear target into every other target. Layering
> targets is simple.
It also introduces a performance penalty, which is measurable on some
workloads. Even dm-linear is not free. The crypt target also has this
feature, so there is precedent.
--
Sincerely,
Demi Marie Obenour (she/her/hers)
Invisible Things Lab
Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (834 bytes)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists