[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAHVum0e+Dih_+hx2-k6Cf8V=udWkqcSKT+JoCo=8+0EMOCMKcw@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 7 Feb 2023 09:48:21 -0800
From: Vipin Sharma <vipinsh@...gle.com>
To: Ben Gardon <bgardon@...gle.com>
Cc: seanjc@...gle.com, pbonzini@...hat.com, dmatlack@...gle.com,
kvm@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [Patch v2 3/5] KVM: x86/mmu: Optimize SPTE change for aging gfn range
On Mon, Feb 6, 2023 at 2:17 PM Ben Gardon <bgardon@...gle.com> wrote:
>
> On Fri, Feb 3, 2023 at 11:28 AM Vipin Sharma <vipinsh@...gle.com> wrote:
> > - * __tdp_mmu_set_spte - Set a TDP MMU SPTE and handle the associated bookkeeping
> > + * _tdp_mmu_set_spte - Set a TDP MMU SPTE and handle the associated bookkeeping
>
> Nit: Not sure how we got to the point of having a single and double
> underscore of the function, but what do you think about just calling
> this one tdp_mmu_set_spte and the other tdp_mmu_iter_set_spte?
I like your idea. I also don't like the single and double underscore
prefix on functions.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists