[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20230207002403.63590-4-namhyung@kernel.org>
Date: Mon, 6 Feb 2023 16:24:03 -0800
From: Namhyung Kim <namhyung@...nel.org>
To: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...nel.org>,
Jiri Olsa <jolsa@...nel.org>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Ian Rogers <irogers@...gle.com>,
Adrian Hunter <adrian.hunter@...el.com>,
linux-perf-users@...r.kernel.org, Will Deacon <will@...nel.org>,
Waiman Long <longman@...hat.com>,
Boqun Feng <boqun.feng@...il.com>,
Davidlohr Bueso <dave@...olabs.net>,
Song Liu <song@...nel.org>, Hao Luo <haoluo@...gle.com>,
bpf@...r.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH 3/3] perf lock contention: Support old rw_semaphore type
The old kernel has a different type of the owner field in rwsem.
We can check it using bpf_core_type_matches() builtin in clang but
it also needs its own version check since it's available on recent
versions.
Cc: Hao Luo <haoluo@...gle.com>
Signed-off-by: Namhyung Kim <namhyung@...nel.org>
---
.../perf/util/bpf_skel/lock_contention.bpf.c | 57 ++++++++++++++-----
1 file changed, 44 insertions(+), 13 deletions(-)
diff --git a/tools/perf/util/bpf_skel/lock_contention.bpf.c b/tools/perf/util/bpf_skel/lock_contention.bpf.c
index c5556606134e..e6007eaeda1a 100644
--- a/tools/perf/util/bpf_skel/lock_contention.bpf.c
+++ b/tools/perf/util/bpf_skel/lock_contention.bpf.c
@@ -84,6 +84,14 @@ struct {
__uint(max_entries, 1);
} addr_filter SEC(".maps");
+struct rw_semaphore___old {
+ struct task_struct *owner;
+} __attribute__((preserve_access_index));
+
+struct rw_semaphore___new {
+ atomic_long_t owner;
+} __attribute__((preserve_access_index));
+
/* control flags */
int enabled;
int has_cpu;
@@ -161,6 +169,41 @@ static inline int update_task_data(struct task_struct *task)
return 0;
}
+#ifndef __has_builtin
+# define __has_builtin(x) 0
+#endif
+
+static inline struct task_struct *get_lock_owner(__u64 lock, __u32 flags)
+{
+ struct task_struct *task;
+ __u64 owner = 0;
+
+ if (flags & LCB_F_MUTEX) {
+ struct mutex *mutex = (void *)lock;
+ owner = BPF_CORE_READ(mutex, owner.counter);
+ } else if (flags == LCB_F_READ || flags == LCB_F_WRITE) {
+#if __has_builtin(bpf_core_type_matches)
+ if (bpf_core_type_matches(struct rw_semaphore___old)) {
+ struct rw_semaphore___old *rwsem = (void *)lock;
+ owner = (unsigned long)BPF_CORE_READ(rwsem, owner);
+ } else if (bpf_core_type_matches(struct rw_semaphore___new)) {
+ struct rw_semaphore___new *rwsem = (void *)lock;
+ owner = BPF_CORE_READ(rwsem, owner.counter);
+ }
+#else
+ /* assume new struct */
+ struct rw_semaphore *rwsem = (void *)lock;
+ owner = BPF_CORE_READ(rwsem, owner.counter);
+#endif
+ }
+
+ if (!owner)
+ return NULL;
+
+ task = (void *)(owner & ~7UL);
+ return task;
+}
+
SEC("tp_btf/contention_begin")
int contention_begin(u64 *ctx)
{
@@ -199,19 +242,7 @@ int contention_begin(u64 *ctx)
struct task_struct *task;
if (lock_owner) {
- if (pelem->flags & LCB_F_MUTEX) {
- struct mutex *lock = (void *)pelem->lock;
- unsigned long owner = BPF_CORE_READ(lock, owner.counter);
-
- task = (void *)(owner & ~7UL);
- } else if (pelem->flags == LCB_F_READ || pelem->flags == LCB_F_WRITE) {
- struct rw_semaphore *lock = (void *)pelem->lock;
- unsigned long owner = BPF_CORE_READ(lock, owner.counter);
-
- task = (void *)(owner & ~7UL);
- } else {
- task = NULL;
- }
+ task = get_lock_owner(pelem->lock, pelem->flags);
/* The flags is not used anymore. Pass the owner pid. */
if (task)
--
2.39.1.519.gcb327c4b5f-goog
Powered by blists - more mailing lists