[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <4bcf4bd9-e638-22a2-044d-47fd5fd5d104@quicinc.com>
Date: Tue, 7 Feb 2023 09:59:57 +0530
From: Kathiravan T <quic_kathirav@...cinc.com>
To: Dmitry Baryshkov <dmitry.baryshkov@...aro.org>,
<krzysztof.kozlowski@...aro.org>, <agross@...nel.org>,
<andersson@...nel.org>, <konrad.dybcio@...aro.org>,
<robh+dt@...nel.org>, <krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@...aro.org>,
<mturquette@...libre.com>, <sboyd@...nel.org>,
<linus.walleij@...aro.org>, <catalin.marinas@....com>,
<will@...nel.org>, <shawnguo@...nel.org>, <arnd@...db.de>,
<marcel.ziswiler@...adex.com>, <nfraprado@...labora.com>,
<robimarko@...il.com>, <quic_gurus@...cinc.com>,
<linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org>, <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>,
<linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, <linux-clk@...r.kernel.org>,
<linux-gpio@...r.kernel.org>,
<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>
CC: <quic_varada@...cinc.com>, <quic_srichara@...cinc.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH V3 5/9] clk: qcom: add Global Clock controller (GCC)
driver for IPQ5332 SoC
Thanks Dmirty for the review!
On 2/6/2023 3:26 PM, Dmitry Baryshkov wrote:
> On 06/02/2023 09:12, Kathiravan T wrote:
> > Add support for the global clock controller found on IPQ5332 SoC.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Kathiravan T <quic_kathirav@...cinc.com>
> > ---
> > Changes in V3:
> > - As I mentined the bindings, changes need to be done in V2 got
> > missed out and same has been done in V3, to call out
> > specifically dropped the CLK_IS_CRITICAL and dropped the
> > gcc_apss_ahb_clk, its source clock and gcc_apss_axi_clk
> > - Used gcc_parent_data_xo wherever applicable and dropped the
> > duplicate entries
> > - dropped the unused parent_map_10 and parent_data_10
> > - Used qcom_cc_probe instead of qcom_cc_really_probe
> > Changes in V2:
> > - Added the 'dependes on' for Kconfig symbol
> > - Dropped the CLK_IS_CRITICAL flag throughout the file
> > - Dropped the gcc_apss_ahb_clk and gcc_apss_axi_clk as these are
> > managed by bootloaders
>
>
> [skipped]
>
> > +static const struct freq_tbl ftbl_gcc_pcie_aux_clk_src[] = {
> > + F(2000000, P_XO, 12, 0, 0),
> > + { }
> > +};
> > +
> > +static struct clk_rcg2 gcc_pcie_aux_clk_src = {
> > + .cmd_rcgr = 0x28004,
> > + .mnd_width = 16,
> > + .hid_width = 5,
> > + .parent_map = gcc_parent_map_6,
> > + .freq_tbl = ftbl_gcc_pcie_aux_clk_src,
> > + .clkr.hw.init = &(const struct clk_init_data){
> > + .name = "gcc_pcie_aux_clk_src",
> > + .parent_data = gcc_parent_data_6,
> > + .num_parents = ARRAY_SIZE(gcc_parent_data_6),
> > + .ops = &clk_rcg2_ops,
> > + },
> > +};
> > +
> > +static struct clk_regmap_mux pcie3x2_pipe_clk_src = {
> > + .reg = 0x28064,
> > + .shift = 8,
> > + .width = 2,
> > + .parent_map = gcc_parent_map_14,
> > + .clkr = {
> > + .hw.init = &(struct clk_init_data){
> > + .name = "pcie3x2_phy_pipe_clk_src",
> > + .parent_data = gcc_parent_data_14,
> > + .num_parents = ARRAY_SIZE(gcc_parent_data_14),
> > + .ops = &clk_regmap_mux_closest_ops,
>
> Should we use clk_regmap_phy_mux_ops here instead?
Sure, I will check this one. Also looking at the commit, 74e4190cdebe
("clk: qcom: regmap: add PHY clock source implementation"), looks like I
can use the clk_regmap_phy_mux struct instead of clk_regmap_mux. I will
check into this and update accordingly.
>
> > + .flags = CLK_SET_RATE_PARENT,
> > + },
> > + },
> > +};
> > +
> > +static struct clk_regmap_mux pcie3x1_0_pipe_clk_src = {
> > + .reg = 0x29064,
> > + .shift = 8,
> > + .width = 2,
> > + .parent_map = gcc_parent_map_15,
> > + .clkr = {
> > + .hw.init = &(struct clk_init_data){
> > + .name = "pcie3x1_0_phy_pipe_clk_src",
> > + .parent_data = gcc_parent_data_15,
> > + .num_parents = ARRAY_SIZE(gcc_parent_data_15),
> > + .ops = &clk_regmap_mux_closest_ops,
>
> And clk_regmap_phy_mux_ops here too?
Ack.
>
> > + .flags = CLK_SET_RATE_PARENT,
> > + },
> > + },
> > +};
> > +
> > +static struct clk_regmap_mux pcie3x1_1_pipe_clk_src = {
> > + .reg = 0x2A064,
> > + .shift = 8,
> > + .width = 2,
> > + .parent_map = gcc_parent_map_16,
> > + .clkr = {
> > + .hw.init = &(struct clk_init_data){
> > + .name = "pcie3x1_1_phy_pipe_clk_src",
> > + .parent_data = gcc_parent_data_16,
> > + .num_parents = ARRAY_SIZE(gcc_parent_data_16),
> > + .ops = &clk_regmap_mux_closest_ops,
>
> And here?
Ack.
>
> > + .flags = CLK_SET_RATE_PARENT,
> > + },
> > + },
> > +};
> > +
>
> [skipped]
>
>
> > +
> > +static struct clk_branch gcc_pcie3x1_0_pipe_clk = {
> > + .halt_reg = 0x29068,
> > + .halt_check = BRANCH_HALT_DELAY,
> > + .clkr = {
> > + .enable_reg = 0x29068,
> > + .enable_mask = BIT(0),
> > + .hw.init = &(const struct clk_init_data){
> > + .name = "gcc_pcie3x1_0_pipe_clk",
> > + .parent_names = (const char *[]){
> > + "pcie3x1_0_pipe_clk_src"
> > + },
>
> Nooo. No parent_names please. You have several of them in the driver
I missed this. I will fix in next spin.
>
> > + .num_parents = 1,
> > + .flags = CLK_SET_RATE_PARENT,
> > + .ops = &clk_branch2_ops,
> > + },
> > + },
> > +};
> > +
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists