[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20230207045838.11243-8-ricardo.neri-calderon@linux.intel.com>
Date: Mon, 6 Feb 2023 20:58:35 -0800
From: Ricardo Neri <ricardo.neri-calderon@...ux.intel.com>
To: "Peter Zijlstra (Intel)" <peterz@...radead.org>,
Juri Lelli <juri.lelli@...hat.com>,
Vincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@...aro.org>
Cc: Ricardo Neri <ricardo.neri@...el.com>,
"Ravi V. Shankar" <ravi.v.shankar@...el.com>,
Ben Segall <bsegall@...gle.com>,
Daniel Bristot de Oliveira <bristot@...hat.com>,
Dietmar Eggemann <dietmar.eggemann@....com>,
Len Brown <len.brown@...el.com>, Mel Gorman <mgorman@...e.de>,
"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael.j.wysocki@...el.com>,
Srinivas Pandruvada <srinivas.pandruvada@...ux.intel.com>,
Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>,
Tim Chen <tim.c.chen@...ux.intel.com>,
Valentin Schneider <vschneid@...hat.com>,
Ionela Voinescu <ionela.voinescu@....com>, x86@...nel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Ricardo Neri <ricardo.neri-calderon@...ux.intel.com>,
"Tim C . Chen" <tim.c.chen@...el.com>
Subject: [PATCH v3 07/10] sched/fair: Do not even the number of busy CPUs via asym_packing
Now that find_busiest_group() triggers load balancing between a fully_
busy SMT2 core and an idle non-SMT core, it is no longer needed to force
balancing via asym_packing. Use asym_packing only as intended: when there
is high-priority CPU that is idle.
After this change, the same logic apply to SMT and non-SMT local groups.
Simplify asym_smt_can_pull_tasks() accordingly.
Cc: Ben Segall <bsegall@...gle.com>
Cc: Daniel Bristot de Oliveira <bristot@...hat.com>
Cc: Dietmar Eggemann <dietmar.eggemann@....com>
Cc: Len Brown <len.brown@...el.com>
Cc: Mel Gorman <mgorman@...e.de>
Cc: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@...el.com>
Cc: Srinivas Pandruvada <srinivas.pandruvada@...ux.intel.com>
Cc: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>
Cc: Tim C. Chen <tim.c.chen@...el.com>
Cc: Valentin Schneider <vschneid@...hat.com>
Cc: x86@...nel.org
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Ricardo Neri <ricardo.neri-calderon@...ux.intel.com>
---
Changes since v2:
* Introduced this patch.
Changes since v1:
* N/A
---
kernel/sched/fair.c | 37 +++++--------------------------------
1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 32 deletions(-)
diff --git a/kernel/sched/fair.c b/kernel/sched/fair.c
index a37ad59f20ea..0ada2d18b934 100644
--- a/kernel/sched/fair.c
+++ b/kernel/sched/fair.c
@@ -9247,20 +9247,15 @@ group_type group_classify(unsigned int imbalance_pct,
* @sgs: Load-balancing statistics of the candidate busiest group
* @sg: The candidate busiest group
*
- * Check the state of the SMT siblings of both @sds::local and @sg and decide
- * if @dst_cpu can pull tasks.
+ * Check the state of the SMT siblings of @sg and decide if @dst_cpu can pull
+ * tasks.
*
* This function must be called only if all the SMT siblings of @dst_cpu are
* idle, if any.
*
- * If @dst_cpu does not have SMT siblings, it can pull tasks if two or more of
- * the SMT siblings of @sg are busy. If only one CPU in @sg is busy, pull tasks
- * only if @dst_cpu has higher priority.
- *
- * If @dst_cpu has SMT siblings, decide based on the priority of @sg. Do it only
- * if @sg has exactly one busy CPU (i.e., one more than @sds::local). Bigger
- * imbalances in the number of busy CPUs will be dealt with in
- * find_busiest_group().
+ * @dst_cpu can pull tasks if @sg has exactly one busy CPU (i.e., one more than
+ * @sds::local) and has lower group priority than @sds::local. Bigger imbalances
+ * in the number of busy CPUs will be dealt with in find_busiest_group().
*
* Return: true if @dst_cpu can pull tasks, false otherwise.
*/
@@ -9269,33 +9264,11 @@ static bool asym_smt_can_pull_tasks(int dst_cpu, struct sd_lb_stats *sds,
struct sched_group *sg)
{
#ifdef CONFIG_SCHED_SMT
- bool local_is_smt;
int sg_busy_cpus;
- local_is_smt = sds->local->flags & SD_SHARE_CPUCAPACITY;
sg_busy_cpus = sgs->group_weight - sgs->idle_cpus;
- if (!local_is_smt) {
- /*
- * If we are here, @dst_cpu is idle and does not have SMT
- * siblings. Pull tasks if candidate group has two or more
- * busy CPUs.
- */
- if (sg_busy_cpus >= 2) /* implies sg_is_smt */
- return true;
-
- /*
- * @dst_cpu does not have SMT siblings. @sg may have SMT
- * siblings and only one is busy. In such case, @dst_cpu
- * can help if it has higher priority and is idle (i.e.,
- * it has no running tasks).
- */
- return sched_asym_prefer(dst_cpu, sg->asym_prefer_cpu);
- }
-
/*
- * @dst_cpu has SMT siblings and are also idle.
- *
* If the difference in the number of busy CPUs is two or more, let
* find_busiest_group() take care of it. We only care if @sg has
* exactly one busy CPU. This covers SMT and non-SMT sched groups.
--
2.25.1
Powered by blists - more mailing lists